These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33296230)

  • 21. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigating the impact of driving automation systems on distracted driving behaviors.
    Dunn NJ; Dingus TA; Soccolich S; Horrey WJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106152. PubMed ID: 33932819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating the out-of-the-loop phenomenon from visual strategies during highly automated driving.
    Schnebelen D; Charron C; Mars F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105776. PubMed ID: 33039817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mind wandering and driving: responsibility case-control study.
    Galéra C; Orriols L; M'Bailara K; Laborey M; Contrand B; Ribéreau-Gayon R; Masson F; Bakiri S; Gabaude C; Fort A; Maury B; Lemercier C; Cours M; Bouvard MP; Lagarde E
    BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8105. PubMed ID: 23241270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Driver Vigilance Decrement is More Severe During Automated Driving than Manual Driving.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):574-588. PubMed ID: 35624552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detecting and Quantifying Mind Wandering during Simulated Driving.
    Baldwin CL; Roberts DM; Barragan D; Lee JD; Lerner N; Higgins JS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():406. PubMed ID: 28848414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems.
    Noble AM; Miles M; Perez MA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105959. PubMed ID: 33385962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways.
    Li Y; Li Z; Wang H; Wang W; Xing L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():137-145. PubMed ID: 28500990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mind wandering during everyday driving: An on-road study.
    Burdett BRD; Charlton SG; Starkey NJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():76-84. PubMed ID: 30315995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot 2.0: The Influence of Practice on Driver Workload and Engagement During On-Road, Partially Automated Driving.
    McDonnell AS; Crabtree KW; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2025-2040. PubMed ID: 37750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Negative mood mind wandering and unsafe driving in young male drivers.
    Albert DA; Claude Ouimet M; Brown TG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106867. PubMed ID: 36308858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Driving with the wandering mind: the effect that mind-wandering has on driving performance.
    Yanko MR; Spalek TM
    Hum Factors; 2014 Mar; 56(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 24689247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? Risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control.
    Zhao X; He R; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105783. PubMed ID: 33022511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.
    Muslim H; Kiu Leung C; Itoh M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.