115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33296875)
1. Development of robustness evaluation strategies for enabling statistically consistent reporting.
Sterpin E; Rivas ST; Van den Heuvel F; George B; Lee JA; Souris K
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045002. PubMed ID: 33296875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
Loebner HA; Volken W; Mueller S; Bertholet J; Mackeprang PH; Guyer G; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4780-4793. PubMed ID: 35451087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved healthy tissue sparing in proton therapy of lung tumors using statistically sound robust optimization and evaluation.
Badiu V; Souris K; Buti G; Villarroel EB; Lambrecht M; Sterpin E
Phys Med; 2022 Apr; 96():62-69. PubMed ID: 35227942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation.
Korevaar EW; Habraken SJM; Scandurra D; Kierkels RGJ; Unipan M; Eenink MGC; Steenbakkers RJHM; Peeters SG; Zindler JD; Hoogeman M; Langendijk JA
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():267-274. PubMed ID: 31492443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Monte Carlo methods to comprehensively evaluate the robustness of 4D treatments in proton therapy.
Souris K; Barragan Montero A; Janssens G; Di Perri D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4676-4684. PubMed ID: 31376305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary evaluation of multifield and single-field optimization for the treatment planning of spot-scanning proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
Quan EM; Liu W; Wu R; Li Y; Frank SJ; Zhang X; Zhu XR; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081709. PubMed ID: 23927306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards fast and robust 4D optimization for moving tumors with scanned proton therapy.
Buti G; Souris K; Montero AMB; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5434-5443. PubMed ID: 31595521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of Photon Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Robustness in Patients With Prostate Cancer as a Proposed Benchmark for Proton Therapy Robustness Evaluation.
Maas JA; McDonald AM; Cardan RA; Snider JW; Fiveash JB; Kole AJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(1):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 37748679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accelerated robust optimization algorithm for proton therapy treatment planning.
Buti G; Souris K; Barragán Montero AM; Cohilis M; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2746-2754. PubMed ID: 32155667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.
Chang Y; Xiao F; Quan H; Yang Z
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):241. PubMed ID: 33069253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Gaussian uncertainty assumptions on probabilistic optimization in particle therapy.
Wieser HP; Karger CP; Wahl N; Bangert M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(14):145007. PubMed ID: 32340012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A spot-specific range uncertainty framework for robust optimization of proton therapy treatments.
Cohilis M; Souris K; Buti G; Chang CW; Lin L; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6554-6568. PubMed ID: 37676906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
