These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33297872)
1. Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users. Kranick M; Wagner L; Plontke S; Rahne T Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 33297872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users. Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users. Tavora-Vieira D; Ffoulkes E Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):294-307. PubMed ID: 36958296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users. Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception. Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation. van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users. Brown CJ; Etler C; He S; O'Brien S; Erenberg S; Kim JR; Dhuldhoya AN; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 18596644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array. Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded Directly Through the Cochlear Implant in Cochlear Implant Recipients: a Feasibility Study. Attias J; HabibAllah S; Aditya Tarigoppula VS; Glick H; Chen C; Kanthaiah K; Litvak L Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 35245922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative Compound Action Potentials as a Predictor of Postoperative Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users. Stutley A; Bogdanov C; Voola MWR; Friedland P; Távora-Vieira D Audiol Neurootol; 2024 Jul; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 39084205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrically evoked late latency response using single electrode stimulation and its relation to speech perception among paediatric cochlear implant users. Saravanan P; Devi N; Geetha C Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1441854. PubMed ID: 39345947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing. Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implant-evoked cortical activation in children with cochlear nerve deficiency. He S; Grose J; Hang AX; Buchman CA Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1188-96. PubMed ID: 22872179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure. Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison. Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users. He S; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Riggs WJ; Carter BL; Xie R Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1228-1244. PubMed ID: 34999595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplitude Growth Functions of Auditory Nerve Responses to Electric Pulse Stimulation With Varied Interphase Gaps in Cochlear Implant Users With Ipsilateral Residual Hearing. Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014137. PubMed ID: 34181493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]