These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33298799)

  • 1. Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Tan MWP; Sayampanathan AA; Jiang L; Guo CM
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Dec; 34(10):395-405. PubMed ID: 33298799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Saadeh YS; Joseph JR; Smith BW; Kirsch MJ; Sabbagh AM; Park P
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1374-e1378. PubMed ID: 30902780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision for Endoscopic Diskectomy: Is Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion an Option?
    Qiao G; Feng M; Wang X; Liu J; Ge M; Yang B; Yue B
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e26-e30. PubMed ID: 31398523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Xu DS; Bach K; Uribe JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E4. PubMed ID: 29290134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].
    Kong F; Zhou Q; Qiao Y; Wang W; Zhang C; Pan Q; Zhu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 36(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 35570634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Ajiboye RM; Alas H; Mosich GM; Sharma A; Pourtaheri S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 May; 31(4):E230-E238. PubMed ID: 28622187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.
    Carlson BB; Saville P; Dowdell J; Goto R; Vaishnav A; Gang CH; McAnany S; Albert TJ; Qureshi S
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 30529420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jiang L; Liu L; Dong L; Xu Z; Zhang X; Qian L
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):108. PubMed ID: 38310205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiological and Clinical Outcomes comparing 2-level MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Chong EY; Tong Tan LY; Chong CS; Yeo W; Siang Koh DT; Jiang L; Guo CM; Cheong Soh RC
    Global Spine J; 2024 Apr; 14(3):986-997. PubMed ID: 36202133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
    Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.