These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33300094)

  • 1. You don't have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections.
    Ecker UKH; Butler LH; Hamby A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Dec; 5(1):64. PubMed ID: 33300094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction format has a limited role when debunking misinformation.
    Swire-Thompson B; Cook J; Butler LH; Sanderson JA; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Dec; 6(1):83. PubMed ID: 34964924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect.
    Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections.
    Prike T; Blackley P; Swire-Thompson B; Ecker UKH
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):39. PubMed ID: 37395864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the effects of simple and refutational narratives in misinformation correction: The moderating roles of correction placement and issue involvement.
    Wang W; Huang Y
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Nov; 32(8):985-1002. PubMed ID: 37194942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening to Misinformation while Driving: Cognitive Load and the Effectiveness of (Repeated) Corrections.
    Sanderson JA; Bowden V; Swire-Thompson B; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH
    J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 12(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 37829768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Credible narrators and misinformed readers.
    Houghton KJ; Poirier RC; Klin CM
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):825-844. PubMed ID: 36450939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
    Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
    Mourali M; Drake C
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Countering Narrative Misinformation: Investigating the Effects of Narrative Corrections and Character Trust on Story-Related Knowledge of HPV.
    Watts J; Moyer-Gusé E
    J Health Commun; 2022 Aug; 27(8):593-602. PubMed ID: 36317831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation.
    Xu Y; Wong R; He S; Veldre A; Andrews S
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1112-1127. PubMed ID: 32430888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
    Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.
    Ecker UKH; Sze BKN; Andreotta M
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200145. PubMed ID: 33612006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):422-436. PubMed ID: 36125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children with specific language impairment: an investigation of their narratives and memory.
    Dodwell K; Bavin EL
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 17852521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of inference-making in children using comprehension questions and story retelling: Effect of text modality and a story presentation format.
    Freed J; Cain K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 May; 56(3):637-652. PubMed ID: 34028960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigm.
    Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE; Huff MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 31561745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.