BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33300311)

  • 1. Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.
    Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Spagnolo E; Clarizia R; Casadio P; Seracchioli R; Ghezzi F; Mautone D; Bruni F; Uccella S
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):e10. PubMed ID: 33300311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
    Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
    Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.
    Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Spagnolo E; Casadio P; Clarizia R; Peiretti M; Bruni F; Peters I; Aletti G
    Anticancer Res; 2012 Feb; 32(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 22287748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
    Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
    Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review.
    Basaran D; Dusek L; Majek O; Cibula D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):3033-40. PubMed ID: 25613389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
    Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Ditto A; Bogani G; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Lopez C; Perotto S; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 May; 29(3):e41. PubMed ID: 29533024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
    He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
    van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
    Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases.
    Chong GO; Park NY; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Nov; 19(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 20009907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urinary tract morbidity after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer.
    Novackova M; Pastor Z; Chmel R; Brtnicky T; Chmel R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 May; 31(5):981-987. PubMed ID: 31444536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.