129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33300501)
1. Direct determination of [Formula: see text] for cylindrical ionization chambers in a 6 MV 0.35 T MR-linac.
Krauss A; Spindeldreier CK; Klüter S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235049. PubMed ID: 33300501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental determination of magnetic field correction factors for ionization chambers in parallel and perpendicular orientations.
Pojtinger S; Nachbar M; Ghandour S; Pisaturo O; Pachoud M; Kapsch RP; Thorwarth D
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245044. PubMed ID: 33181493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental determination of magnetic field quality conversion factors for eleven ionization chambers in 1.5 T and 0.35 T MR-linac systems.
Orlando N; Crosby J; Glide-Hurst C; Culberson W; Keller B; Sarfehnia A
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2998-3009. PubMed ID: 38060696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Water calorimetry in MR-linac: Direct measurement of absorbed dose and determination of chamber
D'Souza M; Nusrat H; Iakovenko V; Keller B; Sahgal A; Renaud J; Sarfehnia A
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6458-6469. PubMed ID: 32970325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental measurement of ionization chamber angular response and associated magnetic field correction factors in MR-linac.
Iakovenko V; Keller B; Sahgal A; Sarfehnia A
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1940-1948. PubMed ID: 31955432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A finite element method for the determination of the relative response of ionization chambers in MR-linacs: simulation and experimental validation up to 1.5 T.
Pojtinger S; Kapsch RP; Dohm OS; Thorwarth D
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(13):135011. PubMed ID: 31181560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetry in 1.5 T MR-Linacs: Monte Carlo determination of magnetic field correction factors and investigation of the air gap effect.
Margaroni V; Pappas EP; Episkopakis A; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Marinos N; Karaiskos P
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1132-1148. PubMed ID: 36349535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying uncertainties associated with reference dosimetry in an MR-Linac.
Iakovenko V; Keller B; Malkov VN; Sahgal A; Sarfehnia A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 24(11):e14087. PubMed ID: 37354202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A Survey of Dosimetry in the Magnetic Field of MR-Linacs].
Sato Y; Abe K; Tsuneda M; Yasui K; Kawachi T; Tohyama N; Mizuno H; Fujita Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2023; 43(4):107-124. PubMed ID: 38417889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators.
Begg J; Jelen U; Moutrie Z; Oliver C; Holloway L; Brown R;
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 36806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in a 0.35 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linac - A Monte Carlo study.
Ullah Khan A; DeWerd LA; Yadav P
Phys Med; 2024 Mar; 119():103314. PubMed ID: 38335742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dosimetry in magnetic fields with Farmer-type ionization chambers: determination of magnetic field correction factors for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations.
Spindeldreier CK; Schrenk O; Bakenecker A; Kawrakow I; Burigo L; Karger CP; Greilich S; Pfaffenberger A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6708-6728. PubMed ID: 28636564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.
O'Brien DJ; Dolan J; Pencea S; Schupp N; Sawakuchi GO
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):884-897. PubMed ID: 29178457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absolute dosimetry of a 1.5 T MR-guided accelerator-based high-energy photon beam in water and solid phantoms using Aerrow.
Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Bancheri J; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1291-1304. PubMed ID: 31834640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculated beam quality correction factors for ionization chambers in MV photon beams.
Tikkanen J; Zink K; Pimpinella M; Teles P; Borbinha J; Ojala J; Siiskonen T; Gomà C; Pinto M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(7):075003. PubMed ID: 31995531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors.
Woodings SJ; van Asselen B; van Soest TL; de Prez LA; Lagendijk JJW; Raaymakers BW; Wolthaus JWH
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3739-3745. PubMed ID: 31131902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental determination of kQ factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in 10 cm × 10 cm and 3 cm × 3 cm photon beams from 4 MV to 25 MV.
Krauss A; Kapsch RP
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4227-46. PubMed ID: 25017482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consequences of air around an ionization chamber: Are existing solid phantoms suitable for reference dosimetry on an MR-linac?
Hackett SL; van Asselen B; Wolthaus JW; Kok JG; Woodings SJ; Lagendijk JJ; Raaymakers BW
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):3961. PubMed ID: 27370114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the feasibility of absolute 3D dosimetry using LiF thermoluminescence detectors and polymer gels on a 0.35T MR-LINAC.
Schwahofer A; Mann P; Spindeldreier CK; Karger CP
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(21):215002. PubMed ID: 33104524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
