These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33301165)

  • 1. Misoprostol vaginal insert and Foley catheter in labour induction - single center retrospective observational study of obstetrical outcome.
    Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Plusajska J; Galuszewska J; Glijer K; Gluszek S
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(11):700-703. PubMed ID: 33301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome.
    Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Armanska J; Swiercz G; Gluszek S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9077. PubMed ID: 33907254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction].
    Panelius E; Heikinheimo O; Rahkonen L
    Duodecim; 2012; 128(20):2093-102. PubMed ID: 23167168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone.
    Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J
    S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is Unfavourable Cervix prior to Labor Induction Risk for Adverse Obstetrical Outcome in Time of Universal Ripening Agents Usage? Single Center Retrospective Observational Study.
    Jakub M; Marta M; Jagoda G; Kamila G; Stanislaw G
    J Pregnancy; 2020; 2020():4985693. PubMed ID: 32953176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Neervoort F; Oude Rengerink K; van Baaren GJ; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf I; van Pampus MG; Franssen M; Oudijk M; van der Salm P; Woiski M; Pernet PJ; Feitsma AH; van Vliet H; Porath M; Roumen F; van Beek E; Versendaal H; Heres M; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Mar; 13():67. PubMed ID: 23506128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Mundle S; Bracken H; Khedikar V; Mulik J; Faragher B; Easterling T; Leigh S; Granby P; Haycox A; Turner MA; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks AD
    Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10095):669-680. PubMed ID: 28668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction.
    Chavakula PR; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Londhe V; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 25661322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.