These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33302020)
21. A Single Intratympanic Triamcinolone Acetonide Administration Elicits Long-Term Reduction in Impedances Following Cochlear Implantation. Nieratschker M; Liepins R; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Gausterer JC; Baumgartner WD; Riss D; Arnoldner C; Dahm V J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024; 53():19160216241288819. PubMed ID: 39415405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How well do cochlear implant intraoperative impedance measures predict postoperative electrode function? Goehring JL; Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Lusk RP Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 23295726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Postoperative dynamics of electrode impedance changes in children with cochlear implants]. Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(5):29-32. PubMed ID: 33140930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An evidence-based guide for intraoperative cochlear implant backup use. Khater AM; Moustafa MF; Said A; Fahmy HS Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1500-4. PubMed ID: 26231744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation. Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Observation on the change of electrode impedance and THR/MCL values in 20 cases with Med-EL Combi 40+ cochlear implant]. Wu W; Jia H; Li Y; Tang Z; Huang Q; Yang J; Mei L; Haung Z; Wu H Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1238-42. PubMed ID: 24616980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-Term Impedance Trend in Cochlear Implant Users with Genetically Determined Congenital Profound Hearing Loss. Brotto D; Caserta E; Sorrentino F; Favaretto N; Marioni G; Martini A; Bovo R; Gheller F; Trevisi P J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):105-114. PubMed ID: 35577055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The analysis of the electrode impedance in different periods after cochlear implantation performed with round window insertion in steroid deposition]. Zhong KB; Wang XQ; Ge RM; Huang HM; Zeng J; Wu PN Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 31(13):988-990. PubMed ID: 29798159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants. Newbold C; Risi F; Hollow R; Yusof Y; Dowell R Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 25766491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of the pre- or postlingual status of cochlear implant recipients on behavioural T/C-levels. Zarowski A; Molisz A; De Coninck L; Vermeiren A; Theunen T; Theuwis L; Przewoźny T; Siebert J; Offeciers FE Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109867. PubMed ID: 31999994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrode impedance changes over time in MED El cochlear implant children recipients: Relation to stimulation levels and behavioral measures. Fayed EA; Zaghloul HS; Morgan AE Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jul; 21(4):192-197. PubMed ID: 31996120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Evolution of impedance field telemetry after one day of activation in cochlear implant recipients. Hu HC; Chen JK; Tsai CM; Chen HY; Tung TH; Li LP PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173367. PubMed ID: 28264044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected? Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of surgical technique on electrode impedance after cochlear implantation. Jia H; Venail F; Piron JP; Batrel C; Pelliccia P; Artières F; Uziel A; Mondain M Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2011 Aug; 120(8):529-34. PubMed ID: 21922977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Extrusion of straight cochlear implant electrodes May be diminished by proximal fixation. Zawawi F; Cushing SL; James AL; Gordon KA; Papsin BC Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():164-167. PubMed ID: 30554690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evolution of impedance values in cochlear implant patients after early switch-on. Wei JJ; Tung TH; Li LP PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246545. PubMed ID: 33606685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrode Array Type and Its Impact on Impedance Fluctuations and Loss of Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implantation. Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Buss E; Park LR; Pillsbury HC; O'Connell BP; Brown KD Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):186-191. PubMed ID: 31743293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode. Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of a sequential cochlear implant of minimum comfort, impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential values of the initial cochlear implant. Ozdemir I; Bozdemir K; Callioglu EE; Bayazit D; Şalviz M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 277(8):2235-2241. PubMed ID: 32447497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]