These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33302146)

  • 1. Recent development of pressure retarded osmosis membranes for water and energy sustainability: A critical review.
    Shi Y; Zhang M; Zhang H; Yang F; Tang CY; Dong Y
    Water Res; 2021 Feb; 189():116666. PubMed ID: 33302146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engineering pressure retarded osmosis membrane bioreactor (PRO-MBR) for simultaneous water and energy recovery from municipal wastewater.
    Liu S; Song W; Meng M; Xie M; She Q; Zhao P; Wang X
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154048. PubMed ID: 35202696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pressure retarded osmosis coupled with activated sludge process for wastewater treatment: Performance and fouling behaviors.
    Meng M; Liu S; Wang X
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Jul; 307():123224. PubMed ID: 32224427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigations of inorganic and organic fouling behaviors, antifouling and cleaning strategies for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membrane using seawater desalination brine and wastewater.
    Han G; Zhou J; Wan C; Yang T; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():264-275. PubMed ID: 27470469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced Anti-Fouling Membranes for Osmotic Power Generation from Wastewater via Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO).
    Han G; Liu JT; Lu KJ; Chung TS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Jun; 52(11):6686-6694. PubMed ID: 29741369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Water reclamation from emulsified oily wastewater via effective forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes under the PRO mode.
    Han G; de Wit JS; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():54-63. PubMed ID: 26043371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carbon Quantum Dots Grafted Antifouling Membranes for Osmotic Power Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Process.
    Zhao DL; Das S; Chung TS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 51(23):14016-14023. PubMed ID: 29161033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comprehensive Review on Forward Osmosis Water Treatment: Recent Advances and Prospects of Membranes and Draw Solutes.
    Xu Y; Zhu Y; Chen Z; Zhu J; Chen G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forward Osmosis in Wastewater Treatment Processes.
    Korenak J; Basu S; Balakrishnan M; Hélix-Nielsen C; Petrinic I
    Acta Chim Slov; 2017 Mac; 64(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 28380231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tackle reverse solute flux in forward osmosis towards sustainable water recovery: reduction and perspectives.
    Zou S; Qin M; He Z
    Water Res; 2019 Feb; 149():362-374. PubMed ID: 30471532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forward osmosis membrane technology for nutrient removal/recovery from wastewater: Recent advances, proposed designs, and future directions.
    Jafarinejad S
    Chemosphere; 2021 Jan; 263():128116. PubMed ID: 33297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients.
    Yip NY; Tiraferri A; Phillip WA; Schiffman JD; Hoover LA; Kim YC; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(10):4360-9. PubMed ID: 21491936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of energy efficiency and power density in pressure retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis.
    Yip NY; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):11002-12. PubMed ID: 25157687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Negatively charged hyperbranched polyglycerol grafted membranes for osmotic power generation from municipal wastewater.
    Li X; Cai T; Chen C; Chung TS
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():50-8. PubMed ID: 26630043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply.
    Klaysom C; Cath TY; Depuydt T; Vankelecom IF
    Chem Soc Rev; 2013 Aug; 42(16):6959-89. PubMed ID: 23778699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost and efficiency perspectives of ceramic membranes for water treatment.
    Dong Y; Wu H; Yang F; Gray S
    Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118629. PubMed ID: 35609431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the Limitations of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis: Membrane Fouling and the Limiting Flux.
    Peters CD; Li D; Mo Z; Hankins NP; She Q
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 May; 56(10):6678-6688. PubMed ID: 35475365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of hydrodynamic operating conditions on organic fouling of spiral-wound forward osmosis membranes: Fouling-induced performance deterioration in FO-RO hybrid system.
    Lee C; Nguyen TT; Adha RS; Shon HK; Kim IS
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 185():116154. PubMed ID: 32823194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.