These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33302228)

  • 21. An Investigation of the Relationships Between Autistic Traits and Crossmodal Correspondences in Typically Developing Adults.
    Hidaka S; Yaguchi A
    Multisens Res; 2018 Jan; 31(8):729-751. PubMed ID: 31264620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory adaptation improves tactile frequency perception.
    Crommett LE; Pérez-Bellido A; Yau JM
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1352-1362. PubMed ID: 28077668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How automatic are crossmodal correspondences?
    Spence C; Deroy O
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Mar; 22(1):245-60. PubMed ID: 23370382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive Styles Differentiate Crossmodal Correspondences Between Pitch Glide and Visual Apparent Motion.
    Guo L; Bao M; Guan L; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):363-385. PubMed ID: 31287072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cross-sensory correspondences and symbolism in spoken and written language.
    Walker P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1339-61. PubMed ID: 26913934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audiovisual Integration During Joint Action: No Effects for Motion Discrimination and Temporal Order Judgment Tasks.
    Wahn B; Dosso JA; Kingstone A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():79. PubMed ID: 32116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Convergent and invariant object representations for sight, sound, and touch.
    Man K; Damasio A; Meyer K; Kaplan JT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3629-40. PubMed ID: 26047030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences.
    Hamilton-Fletcher G; Pisanski K; Reby D; Stefańczyk M; Ward J; Sorokowska A
    Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():114-121. PubMed ID: 29502009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oscillatory signatures of crossmodal congruence effects: An EEG investigation employing a visuotactile pattern matching paradigm.
    Göschl F; Friese U; Daume J; König P; Engel AK
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 116():177-86. PubMed ID: 25846580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines.
    Parise CV
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):7-28. PubMed ID: 27311289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(12):1292-303. PubMed ID: 11566312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Others' actions reduce crossmodal integration in peripersonal space.
    Heed T; Habets B; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Curr Biol; 2010 Aug; 20(15):1345-9. PubMed ID: 20619649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Crossmodal Correspondences: Four Challenges.
    Deroy O; Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):29-48. PubMed ID: 27311290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains.
    Walker L; Walker P; Francis B
    Perception; 2012; 41(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23469700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting the crossmodal correspondences of odors using an electronic nose.
    Ward RJ; Rahman S; Wuerger S; Marshall A
    Heliyon; 2022 Apr; 8(4):e09284. PubMed ID: 35497032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.