These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis. Fink M; Hottier F; Cardoso JF Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 6683891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of theoretical diffraction correction functions for strongly focused high frequency ultrasonic transducers. Machado JC; Foster FS Ultrason Imaging; 1999 Apr; 21(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 10485564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation of ultrasound two-dimensional array transducers using a frequency domain model. Rao M; Varghese T; Zagzebski JA Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3162-9. PubMed ID: 18697541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partially coherent transducers: the random phase transducer approach. Mallart R; Fink M; Laugier P; Abouelkaram S Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Jul; 12(3):205-28. PubMed ID: 2195741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of an Estimation Instrument of Acoustic Lens Properties for Medical Ultrasound Transducers. Choi H; Jeong JJ; Kim J J Healthc Eng; 2017; 2017():6580217. PubMed ID: 29464102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beam pattern (diffraction) correction for ultrasonic attenuation measurement. Robinson DE; Wilson LS; Bianchi T Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Jul; 6(3):293-303. PubMed ID: 6396923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel numerical approach to stimulation of a specific brain region using transcranial focused ultrasound. Park TY; Pahk KJ; Kim H Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():3697-3700. PubMed ID: 30441175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration of focused ultrasonic transducers and absolute measurements of fluid nonlinearity with diffraction and attenuation corrections. Li X; Zhang S; Jeong H; Cho S J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):984. PubMed ID: 28863570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An exposimetry system using tissue-mimicking liquid. Stiles TA; Madsen EL; Frank GR Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 17720296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of non-optimal focusing on dual-frequency ultrasound measurements of bone. Malo MK; Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Isaksson H; Jurvelin JS; Töyräs J IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1182-8. PubMed ID: 21693400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transducer characterization from pressure amplitude distribution measurements using a Kalman filter as parameter estimation algorithm. Linssen FM; Hoeks AP Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Oct; 12(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 2256230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic measurements in a tissue mimicking liquid. Macdonald MC; Madsen EL J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 9952080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A beam corrected estimation of the frequency dependent attenuation of biological tissues from backscattered ultrasound. Cloostermans MJ; Thijssen JM Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 6683892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of low-frequency ultrasonic wave in water using an acoustic fiber sensor. Sakoda T; Sonoda Y IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Apr; 53(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 16615580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of overlying soft tissues on trabecular bone acoustic measurement at various ultrasound frequencies. Riekkinen O; Hakulinen MA; Timonen M; Töyräs J; Jurvelin JS Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1073-83. PubMed ID: 16829321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]