212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33303873)
1. Evaluation of methods for the reduction of contaminating host reads when performing shotgun metagenomic sequencing of the milk microbiome.
Yap M; Feehily C; Walsh CJ; Fenelon M; Murphy EF; McAuliffe FM; van Sinderen D; O'Toole PW; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21665. PubMed ID: 33303873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Host DNA depletion methods and genome-centric metagenomics of bovine hindmilk microbiome.
Duarte VdS; Porcellato D
mSphere; 2024 Jan; 9(1):e0047023. PubMed ID: 38054728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Host Depletion and Extraction Methods for Shotgun Metagenomic Analysis of Bovine Vaginal Samples.
Ong CT; Boe-Hansen G; Ross EM; Blackall PJ; Turni C; Hayes BJ; Tabor AE
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0041221. PubMed ID: 35404108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion.
Marotz CA; Sanders JG; Zuniga C; Zaramela LS; Knight R; Zengler K
Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):42. PubMed ID: 29482639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High Sensitivity of Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing in Colon Tissue Biopsy by Host DNA Depletion.
Cheng WY; Liu WX; Ding Y; Wang G; Shi Y; Chu ESH; Wong S; Sung JJY; Yu J
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 21(6):1195-1205. PubMed ID: 36174929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid, ultra-deep metagenomic sequencing enables genomic and functional characterization of low-abundance species in the human gut microbiome.
Jin H; You L; Zhao F; Li S; Ma T; Kwok LY; Xu H; Sun Z
Gut Microbes; 2022; 14(1):2021790. PubMed ID: 35067170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbial community analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology: a beginner's guide for microbiologists.
Jo J; Oh J; Park C
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):176-192. PubMed ID: 32108314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An efficient method for high molecular weight bacterial DNA extraction suitable for shotgun metagenomics from skin swabs.
Serghiou IR; Baker D; Evans R; Dalby MJ; Kiu R; Trampari E; Phillips S; Watt R; Atkinson T; Murphy B; Hall LJ; Webber MA
Microb Genom; 2023 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 37428148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metagenomic deep sequencing reveals association of microbiome signature with functional biases in bovine mastitis.
Hoque MN; Istiaq A; Clement RA; Sultana M; Crandall KA; Siddiki AZ; Hossain MA
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13536. PubMed ID: 31537825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comprehensive investigation of metagenome assembly by linked-read sequencing.
Zhang L; Fang X; Liao H; Zhang Z; Zhou X; Han L; Chen Y; Qiu Q; Li SC
Microbiome; 2020 Nov; 8(1):156. PubMed ID: 33176883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct identification and molecular characterization of zoonotic hazards in raw milk by metagenomics using
Grützke J; Gwida M; Deneke C; Brendebach H; Projahn M; Schattschneider A; Hofreuter D; El-Ashker M; Malorny B; Al Dahouk S
Microb Genom; 2021 May; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 33945456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and Demonstration of Mock Communities as Control Reagents for Accurate Human Microbiome Community Measurements.
Tourlousse DM; Narita K; Miura T; Ohashi A; Matsuda M; Ohyama Y; Shimamura M; Furukawa M; Kasahara K; Kameyama K; Saito S; Goto M; Shimizu R; Mishima R; Nakayama J; Hosomi K; Kunisawa J; Terauchi J; Sekiguchi Y; Kawasaki H
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0191521. PubMed ID: 35234490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of microbial DNA enrichment tools for metagenomic whole genome sequencing.
Thoendel M; Jeraldo PR; Greenwood-Quaintance KE; Yao JZ; Chia N; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP; Patel R
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():141-145. PubMed ID: 27237775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finding the right fit: evaluation of short-read and long-read sequencing approaches to maximize the utility of clinical microbiome data.
Gehrig JL; Portik DM; Driscoll MD; Jackson E; Chakraborty S; Gratalo D; Ashby M; Valladares R
Microb Genom; 2022 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35302439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Purifying the impure: sequencing metagenomes and metatranscriptomes from complex animal-associated samples.
Lim YW; Haynes M; Furlan M; Robertson CE; Harris JK; Rohwer F
J Vis Exp; 2014 Dec; (94):. PubMed ID: 25549184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microbial resolution of whole genome shotgun and 16S amplicon metagenomic sequencing using publicly available NEON data.
Brumfield KD; Huq A; Colwell RR; Olds JL; Leddy MB
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228899. PubMed ID: 32053657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing data for the taxonomic characterization of the gut microbiota.
Durazzi F; Sala C; Castellani G; Manfreda G; Remondini D; De Cesare A
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3030. PubMed ID: 33542369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
