These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33304489)

  • 1. Incorporating capture heterogeneity in the estimation of autoregressive coefficients of animal population dynamics using capture-recapture data.
    Nicolau PG; Sørbye SH; Yoccoz NG
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):12710-12726. PubMed ID: 33304489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models.
    Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated animal movement and spatial capture-recapture models: Simulation, implementation, and inference.
    Gardner B; McClintock BT; Converse SJ; Hostetter NJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3771. PubMed ID: 35638187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating population dynamics models and distance sampling data: a spatial hierarchical state-space approach.
    Nadeem K; Moore JE; Zhang Y; Chipman H
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1735-1745. PubMed ID: 27859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ESTIMABILITY OF DENSITY DEPENDENCE IN MODELS OF TIME SERIES DATA.
    Knape J
    Ecology; 2008 Nov; 89(11):2994-3000. PubMed ID: 31766811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling.
    Conroy MJ; Runge JP; Barker RJ; Schofield MR; Fonnesbeck CJ
    Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3362-70. PubMed ID: 19137943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferences about population dynamics from count data using multistate models: a comparison to capture-recapture approaches.
    Zipkin EF; Sillett TS; Grant EH; Chandler RB; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Feb; 4(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 24634726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixture regression models for closed population capture-recapture data.
    Tounkara F; Rivest LP
    Biometrics; 2015 Sep; 71(3):721-30. PubMed ID: 25963047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of Spatial and Closed Capture-Recapture Models on Known Population of the Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) in Senegal.
    Jůnek T; Jůnková Vymyslická P; Hozdecká K; Hejcmanová P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136525. PubMed ID: 26334997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of capture probabilities using generalized estimating equations and mixed effects approaches.
    Akanda MA; Alpizar-Jara R
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Apr; 4(7):1158-65. PubMed ID: 24772290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new mark-recapture approach for abundance estimation of social species.
    Hickey JR; Sollmann R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208726. PubMed ID: 30571710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semiparametric empirical likelihood inference for abundance from one-inflated capture-recapture data.
    Liu Y; Li P; Liu Y; Zhang R
    Biom J; 2022 Aug; 64(6):1040-1055. PubMed ID: 35429047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum likelihood estimation for model Mt,α for capture-recapture data with misidentification.
    Vale RT; Fewster RM; Carroll EL; Patenaude NJ
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):962-71. PubMed ID: 24942186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of hidden Markov capture-recapture models to estimate abundance in the presence of uncertainty: Application to the estimation of prevalence of hybrids in animal populations.
    Santostasi NL; Ciucci P; Caniglia R; Fabbri E; Molinari L; Reggioni W; Gimenez O
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(2):744-755. PubMed ID: 30766665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pairing field methods to improve inference in wildlife surveys while accommodating detection covariance.
    Clare J; McKinney ST; DePue JE; Loftin CS
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Oct; 27(7):2031-2047. PubMed ID: 28644579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian estimation of a cancer population by capture-recapture with individual capture heterogeneity and small sample.
    Bailly L; Daurès JP; Dunais B; Pradier C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():39. PubMed ID: 25902941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model.
    Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 19930186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.