These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33304489)

  • 21. Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice.
    Schofield MR; Barker RJ; Link WA; Pavanato H
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3803-3817. PubMed ID: 36654190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Partial and complete dependency among data sets has minimal consequence on estimates from integrated population models.
    Weegman MD; Arnold TW; Clark RG; Schaub M
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2258. PubMed ID: 33176007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.
    Muff S; Signer J; Fieberg J
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 31454066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations.
    Borchers DL; Stevenson BC; Kidney D; Thomas L; Marques TA
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015 Jan; 110(509):195-204. PubMed ID: 26063947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Open population maximum likelihood spatial capture-recapture.
    Glennie R; Borchers DL; Murchie M; Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1345-1355. PubMed ID: 31045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coping with intrasexual behavioral differences: Capture-recapture abundance estimation of male cheetah.
    Edwards S; Fischer M; Wachter B; Melzheimer J
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(18):9171-9180. PubMed ID: 30377492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models.
    Lee SM; Chao A
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 19480084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accounting for sampling error when inferring population synchrony from time-series data: a Bayesian state-space modelling approach with applications.
    Santin-Janin H; Hugueny B; Aubry P; Fouchet D; Gimenez O; Pontier D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87084. PubMed ID: 24489839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robustness of close-kin mark-recapture estimators to dispersal limitation and spatially varying sampling probabilities.
    Conn PB; Bravington MV; Baylis S; Ver Hoef JM
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Jun; 10(12):5558-5569. PubMed ID: 32607174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the size of a closed population by modeling latent and observed heterogeneity.
    Bartolucci F; Forcina A
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38536746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Capture-recapture analysis with a latent class model allowing for local dependence and observed heterogeneity.
    Thandrayen J; Wang Y
    Biom J; 2010 Aug; 52(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 20669247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimating population size for a continuous time frailty model with covariates in a capture-recapture study.
    Xu Y; Liu L; You N; Pan H; Yip P
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):917-21. PubMed ID: 17403102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The applications of capture-recapture models to epidemiological data.
    Chao A; Tsay PK; Lin SH; Shau WY; Chao DY
    Stat Med; 2001 Oct; 20(20):3123-57. PubMed ID: 11590637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.