139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33304540)
1. Lining the nest with more feathers increases offspring recruitment probability: Selection on an extended phenotype in the blue tit.
Järvinen P; Brommer JE
Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 10(23):13327-13333. PubMed ID: 33304540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low heritability of nest construction in a wild bird.
Järvinen P; Kluen E; Brommer JE
Biol Lett; 2017 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 29046371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nest decoration: birds exploit a fear of feathers to guard their nest from usurpation.
Slagsvold T; Wiebe KL
R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 8(11):211579. PubMed ID: 34804584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nest size is predicted by female identity and the local environment in the blue tit (
O'Neill LG; Parker TH; Griffith SC
R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Apr; 5(4):172036. PubMed ID: 29765658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental evidence for state-dependent nest weight in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus.
Mainwaring MC; Hartley IR
Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 19429209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial activity of nest-lining feathers is enhanced by breeding activity in avian nests.
Ruiz-Castellano C; Ruiz-Rodríguez M; Tomás G; Soler JJ
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2019 May; 95(5):. PubMed ID: 30985888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraspecific variation and interspecific differences in the bacterial and fungal assemblages of blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tit (Parus major) nests.
Goodenough AE; Stallwood B
Microb Ecol; 2010 Feb; 59(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 19830477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The extended avian urban phenotype: anthropogenic solid waste pollution, nest design, and fitness.
Jagiello Z; Corsini M; Dylewski Ł; Ibáñez-Álamo JD; Szulkin M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 2):156034. PubMed ID: 35595141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nest design in a changing world: great tit
Lambrechts MM; Charmantier A; Demeyrier V; Lucas A; Perret S; Abouladzé M; Bonnet M; Canonne C; Faucon V; Grosset S; le Prado G; Lidon F; Noell T; Pagano P; Perret V; Pouplard S; Spitaliéry R; Bernard C; Perret P; Blondel J; Grégoire A
Urban Ecosyst; 2017 Dec; 20(6):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 29230087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Environmental conditions but not nest composition affect reproductive success in an urban bird.
Capilla-Lasheras P; Bondía B; Aguirre JI
Ecol Evol; 2021 Apr; 11(7):3084-3092. PubMed ID: 33841769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Habitat-dependent
Garrido-Bautista J; Martínez-de la Puente J; Ros-Santaella JL; Pintus E; Lopezosa P; Bernardo N; Comas M; Moreno-Rueda G
Parasitology; 2022 Jul; 149(8):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 35570671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nest building in titmice Paridae: Selectivity in bryophyte use.
Rydgren K; Indreeide B; Slagsvold T; Lampe HM
Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9852. PubMed ID: 36911310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Plumage and eggshell colouration covary with the level of sex-specific parental contributions to nest building in birds.
Nagy J; Hauber ME; Löki V; Mainwaring MC
Naturwissenschaften; 2024 Feb; 111(2):12. PubMed ID: 38411714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of interspecific coexistence on laying date and clutch size in two closely related species of hole-nesting birds.
Møller AP; Balbontín J; Dhondt AA; Remeš V; Adriaensen F; Biard C; Camprodon J; Cichoń M; Doligez B; Dubiec A; Eens M; Eeva T; Goodenough AE; Gosler AG; Gustafsson L; Heeb P; Hinsley SA; Jacob S; Juškaitis R; Laaksonen T; Leclercq B; Massa B; Mazgajski TD; Nager RG; Nilsson JÅ; Nilsson SG; Norte AC; Pinxten R; Robles H; Solonen T; Sorace A; van Noordwijk AJ; Lambrechts MM
J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1738-1748. PubMed ID: 30101503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local individual preferences for nest materials in a passerine bird.
Mennerat A; Perret P; Lambrechts MM
PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5104. PubMed ID: 19337365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) respond to an experimental change in the aromatic plant odour composition of their nest.
Mennerat A
Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 18692552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pollution-related changes in nest microbiota: Implications for growth and fledging in three passerine birds.
Leino LI; Vesterinen EJ; Sánchez-Virosta P; Puigbò P; Eeva T; Rainio MJ
Environ Pollut; 2024 Jun; 357():124434. PubMed ID: 38936789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental evidence of non-random nest material selection in pied flycatchers.
Briggs KB; Mainwaring MC
Behav Processes; 2019 Jul; 164():59-64. PubMed ID: 31014981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nest Material Shapes Eggs Bacterial Environment.
Ruiz-Castellano C; Tomás G; Ruiz-Rodríguez M; Martín-Gálvez D; Soler JJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148894. PubMed ID: 26871451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No evidence that nest site choice in Pied Flycatchers is mediated by assessing the clutch size of a heterospecific, the Great Tit.
Slagsvold T; Wiebe KL
J Ornithol; 2021; 162(4):997-1007. PubMed ID: 34722110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
