These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33304615)

  • 1. Spatial Correlation and Breast Cancer Risk.
    Fowler EEE; Hathaway C; Tillman F; Weinfurtner R; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2019 Jul; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 33304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calibrated Breast Density Measurements.
    Fowler EE; Smallwood A; Khan N; Miltich C; Drukteinis J; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 30545682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalized breast density metrics.
    Fowler EEE; Smallwood A; Miltich C; Drukteinis J; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015006. PubMed ID: 30523909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibrated breast density methods for full field digital mammography: a system for serial quality control and inter-system generalization.
    Lu B; Smallwood AM; Sellers TA; Drukteinis JS; Heine JJ; Fowler EE
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):623-36. PubMed ID: 25652480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
    Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
    Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N; Sechopoulos I; Mattsson S
    Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25554018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
    Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density Using Artificial Neural Network-Based Calibration of Full-Field Digital Mammography: Feasibility on Japanese Women With and Without Breast Cancer.
    Wang J; Kato F; Yamashita H; Baba M; Cui Y; Li R; Oyama-Manabe N; Shirato H
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Apr; 30(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27832519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures.
    Conant EF; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Gastounioti A; McDonald ES; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2017 Jun; 283(3):673-680. PubMed ID: 28121523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calibrated measures for breast density estimation.
    Heine JJ; Cao K; Rollison DE
    Acad Radiol; 2011 May; 18(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 21371912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.