These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33305690)

  • 21. Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.
    Sutojo S; van de Par S; Schoenmaker E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 29855098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise.
    Johansson MS; Arlinger SD
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jul; 41(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 12166687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of a short-time version of the Equalization-Cancellation model to speech intelligibility experiments with speech maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):768-76. PubMed ID: 25096111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
    Collin B; Lavandier M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the importance of interaural noise coherence and the medial olivocochlear reflex for binaural unmasking in free-field listening.
    Marrufo-Pérez MI; Araquistain-Serrat L; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 405():108246. PubMed ID: 33872834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Krawczyk-Becker M; Marquardt D; Herzke T; Coleman G; Adiloğlu K; Bomke K; Plotz K; Gerkmann T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring and modeling speech intelligibility in real and loudspeaker-based virtual sound environments.
    Ahrens A; Marschall M; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():307-317. PubMed ID: 30867112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Further validation of a binaural model predicting speech intelligibility against envelope-modulated noises.
    Vicente T; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107937. PubMed ID: 32192940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.
    Culling JF; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jan; 107(1):517-27. PubMed ID: 10641660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF; Mansell ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigating the role of harmonic cancellation in speech-on-speech masking.
    Prud'homme L; Lavandier M; Best V
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108562. PubMed ID: 35768309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.