These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33305696)

  • 21. Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in cochlear implant listeners: A temporal processing approach.
    Saki N; Nikakhlagh S; Mirmomeni G; Bayat A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2019 Jan; 23(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 31469526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intonational cues for speech perception in noise by cochlear implant listeners.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 277(12):3315-3321. PubMed ID: 32444968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.
    Drennan WR; Won JH; Timme AO; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 26656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamic Current Focusing: A Novel Approach to Loudness Coding in Cochlear Implants.
    de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 29742542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Central Auditory Processing of Temporal and Spectral-Variance Cues in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Pham CQ; Bremen P; Shen W; Yang SM; Middlebrooks JC; Zeng FG; Mc Laughlin M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132423. PubMed ID: 26176553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
    Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
    De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimization of speech processor fitting strategies for Chinese-speaking cochlear implantees.
    Sun JC; Skinner MW; Liu SY; Wang FN; Huang TS; Lin T
    Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):560-8. PubMed ID: 9546270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users.
    Jenkins HA; Uhler K
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22158017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2673-2680. PubMed ID: 31177325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.