These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33306205)

  • 1. A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing.
    Smith G; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2020 Dec; 44(12):e12918. PubMed ID: 33306205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.
    Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue integration during sentence comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206616. PubMed ID: 30496297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.
    Villata S; Tabor W; Franck J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2. PubMed ID: 29403414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cue Combinatorics in Memory Retrieval for Anaphora.
    Parker D
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 43(3):e12715. PubMed ID: 30900293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Prominence and Cue Association on Retrieval Processes: A Computational Account.
    Engelmann F; JÓ“ger LA; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Dec; 43(12):e12800. PubMed ID: 31858626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectations modulate retrieval interference during ellipsis resolution.
    Tung TY; Brennan JR
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Nov; 190():108680. PubMed ID: 37739260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct evidence of memory retrieval as a source of difficulty in non-local dependencies in language.
    Fedorenko E; Woodbury R; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Mar; 37(2):378-94. PubMed ID: 23362990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading.
    Kush D; Johns CL; Van Dyke JA
    J Mem Lang; 2015; 79-80():18-29. PubMed ID: 26893535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational Models of Retrieval Processes in Sentence Processing.
    Vasishth S; Nicenboim B; Engelmann F; Burchert F
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 23(11):968-982. PubMed ID: 31668586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing.
    Troyer M; Hofmeister P; Kutas M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():374. PubMed ID: 27014172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word vs. World Knowledge: A developmental shift from bottom-up lexical cues to top-down plausibility.
    Yacovone A; Shafto CL; Worek A; Snedeker J
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Dec; 131():101442. PubMed ID: 34837815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence.
    Martin AE; McElree B
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(6):769-783. PubMed ID: 31131287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
    Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension.
    Tanner D; Grey S; van Hell JG
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Feb; 54(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 27859315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean.
    Kwon N; Sturt P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1320. PubMed ID: 31244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Representational Complexity and Memory Retrieval in Language Comprehension.
    Hofmeister P
    Lang Cogn Process; 2011; 26(3):376-405. PubMed ID: 22675235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.
    Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):407-30. PubMed ID: 17352621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Retrieval Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension.
    Sekerina IA; Campanelli L; Van Dyke JA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():873. PubMed ID: 27378974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.