134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33306547)
1. Cost-Effectiveness of Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: A Micro-Simulation Modeling Analysis.
Verkleij ML; Heijnsdijk EAM; Bussé AML; Carr G; Goedegebure A; Mackey AR; Qirjazi B; Uhlén IM; Sloot F; Hoeve HLJ; de Koning HJ;
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):909-916. PubMed ID: 33306547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of a neonatal hearing screening programme in three provinces in Albania.
Bussé AM; Qirjazi B; Goedegebure A; Toll M; Hoeve HL; Toçi E; Roshi E; Carr G; Simonsz HJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jul; 134():110039. PubMed ID: 32304854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining concordance and cost impact of otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response in newborn hearing screening in a tertiary hospital.
Ong KMC; Rivera AS; Chan AL; Chiong CM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jan; 128():109704. PubMed ID: 31606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate.
Ngui LX; Tang IP; Prepageran N; Lai ZW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving newborn hearing screening: Are automated auditory brainstem response ear inserts an effective option?
Chan KT; Wong EC; Law CW; Chong HM; McPherson B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1920-5. PubMed ID: 26412459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of technology choice on service provision for universal newborn hearing screening within a busy district hospital.
Iley KL; Addis RJ
J Perinatol; 2000 Dec; 20(8 Pt 2):S122-7. PubMed ID: 11190692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.
Escobar-Ipuz FA; Soria-Bretones C; García-Jiménez MA; Cueto EM; Torres Aranda AM; Sotos JM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109647. PubMed ID: 31470205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis on implementing newborn hearing screening programmes in a low- to middle-income country.
Pitathawatchai P; Chaichulee S; Wannaro W; Pongprawat P
Int J Audiol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 35075981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.
Kadirogullari P; Yalcin Bahat P; Karabuk E; Bagci Cakmak K; Seckin KD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6254-6259. PubMed ID: 33882796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs.
Benito-Orejas JI; Ramírez B; Morais D; Almaraz A; Fernández-Calvo JL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1193-201. PubMed ID: 18550180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of long-term impacts of universal newborn hearing screening.
Chiou ST; Lung HL; Chen LS; Yen AM; Fann JC; Chiu SY; Chen HH
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27598544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of a 10-year hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem response in newborns: The two-step AABR method.
Shim J; Kim H; Kwon Y; Chang J; Park E; Im GJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 151():110947. PubMed ID: 34700296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of currently available devices designed for newborn hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem and/or otoacoustic emission measurements.
Meier S; Narabayashi O; Probst R; Schmuziger N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 15183584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neonatal hearing screening of high-risk infants using automated auditory brainstem response: a retrospective analysis of referral rates.
McGurgan IJ; Patil N
Ir J Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 183(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 24097063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
