133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33306547)
21. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using benefit-cost ratio to select Universal Newborn Hearing Screening test criteria.
Porter HL; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 19455038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai - A prospective study.
Vignesh SS; Jaya V; Sasireka BI; Sarathy K; Vanthana M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 79(10):1745-7. PubMed ID: 26296879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two hearing screening programs in the same population: oto-acoustic emissions (OAE) screening in newborns and behavioral screening when infants.
Geal-Dor M; Adelman C; Levi H; Zentner G; Stein-Zamir C
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 74(12):1351-5. PubMed ID: 20869779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Newborn hearing screening].
Babac S; Djerić D; Ivanković Z
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2007; 135(5-6):264-8. PubMed ID: 17633310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Newborn hearing screening at a community-based obstetric unit: Screening and diagnostic outcomes.
de Kock T; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 84():124-31. PubMed ID: 27063767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Universal neonatal hearing screening of infants with otoacoustic emissions].
Anderssen SH; Andresen J; Andersen R; Sponheim L
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Sep; 122(22):2187-9. PubMed ID: 12426894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Universal newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in Hungary: 5-year experience in diagnostics and influence on the early intervention.
Gáborján A; Katona G; Szabó M; Muzsik B; Küstel M; Horváth M; Tamás L
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 279(12):5647-5654. PubMed ID: 35767058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of hearing screening programmes across 47 countries or regions II: coverage, referral, follow-up and detection rates from newborn hearing screening.
Mackey AR; Bussé AML; Hoeve HLJ; Goedegebure A; Carr G; Simonsz HJ; Uhlén IM;
Int J Audiol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):831-840. PubMed ID: 33686919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Newborn hearing screening protocols and their outcomes: A systematic review.
Kanji A; Khoza-Shangase K; Moroe N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 115():104-109. PubMed ID: 30368368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a national neonatal hearing screening program in China: conditions for the scale-up.
Tobe RG; Mori R; Huang L; Xu L; Han D; Shibuya K
PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e51990. PubMed ID: 23341887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission.
Mehl AL; Thomson V
Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Otoacoustic Emissions in Rural Nicaragua: Cost Analysis and Implications for Newborn Hearing Screening.
Wong LY; Espinoza F; Alvarez KM; Molter D; Saunders JE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 May; 156(5):877-885. PubMed ID: 28457225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of hearing screening programmes across 47 countries or regions I: provision of newborn hearing screening.
Bussé AML; Mackey AR; Hoeve HLJ; Goedegebure A; Carr G; Uhlén IM; Simonsz HJ;
Int J Audiol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):821-830. PubMed ID: 33688794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem responses for pre-discharge neonatal hearing screening.
Clarke P; Iqbal M; Mitchell S
Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):443-7. PubMed ID: 14658852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
