These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33306881)
1. Towards a standardized classification of cardiogenic shock: Will the new SCAI staging system translate into better clinical practice and research? Nicolas J; Mehran R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):1348-1349. PubMed ID: 33306881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 registry. Morici N; Frea S; Bertaina M; Sacco A; Corrada E; Dini CS; Briani M; Tedeschi M; Saia F; Colombo C; Rota M; Oliva F; Iannaccone M; De Ferrari GM; Sionis A; Kapur NK; Tavazzi G; Pappalardo F Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Jan; 101(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 36378673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis. Baran DA; Long A; Badiye AP; Stelling K Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Dec; 96(7):1339-1347. PubMed ID: 33026155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Jentzer JC; van Diepen S; Barsness GW; Henry TD; Menon V; Rihal CS; Naidu SS; Baran DA J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 74(17):2117-2128. PubMed ID: 31548097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SCAI cardiogenic shock classification after out of hospital cardiac arrest and association with outcome. Pareek N; Dworakowski R; Webb I; Barash J; Emezu G; Melikian N; Hill J; Shah A; MacCarthy P; Byrne J Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E288-E297. PubMed ID: 32445610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinician and Algorithmic Application of the 2019 and 2022 Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention Shock Stages in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry. Patel SM; Berg DD; Bohula EA; Baird-Zars VM; Barnett CF; Barsness GW; Chaudhry SP; Daniels LB; van Diepen S; Ghafghazi S; Goldfarb MJ; Jentzer JC; Katz JN; Kenigsberg BB; Lawler PR; Miller PE; Papolos AI; Park JG; Potter BJ; Prasad R; Singam NSV; Sinha SS; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Morrow DA; Circ Heart Fail; 2023 Jan; 16(1):e009714. PubMed ID: 36458542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the SCAI classification in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock. Schrage B; Dabboura S; Yan I; Hilal R; Neumann JT; Sörensen NA; Goßling A; Becher PM; Grahn H; Wagner T; Seiffert M; Kluge S; Reichenspurner H; Blankenberg S; Westermann D Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 96(3):E213-E219. PubMed ID: 31925996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. It's not shocking that the SCAI shock classification works. Grines CL; Marshall JJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(6):1143-1144. PubMed ID: 33217188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Assessment of Shock Severity in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients. Roeschl T; Hinrichs N; Hommel M; Pfahringer B; Balzer F; Falk V; O'Brien B; Ott SC; Potapov E; Schoenrath F; Meyer A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Oct; 82(17):1691-1706. PubMed ID: 37852698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Baran DA; Grines CL; Bailey S; Burkhoff D; Hall SA; Henry TD; Hollenberg SM; Kapur NK; O'Neill W; Ornato JP; Stelling K; Thiele H; van Diepen S; Naidu SS Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 94(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 31104355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 Registry. Serrao G; Dangas G Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Feb; 101(3):676. PubMed ID: 36748779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients. Jentzer JC; Baran DA; van Diepen S; Barsness GW; Henry TD; Naidu SS; Bell MR; Holmes DR Am Heart J; 2020 Jan; 219():37-46. PubMed ID: 31710843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Kapur NK; Thayer KL; Zweck E Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 32280413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiogenic shock trajectories: is the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions definition the right one? Dorian D; Thomson RJ; Lim HS; Proudfoot AG Curr Opin Crit Care; 2024 Aug; 30(4):324-332. PubMed ID: 38841918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PROGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF SERIAL DETERMINATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS SHOCK CLASSIFICATION IN ADULTS WITH CRITICAL ILLNESS. Jentzer JC; Sanghavi D; Patel PC; Bhattacharyya A; van Diepen S; Herasevich V; Gajic O; Kashani KB Shock; 2024 Feb; 61(2):246-252. PubMed ID: 38150371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Fuernau G; Fengler K; Desch S; Eitel I; Neumann FJ; Olbrich HG; de Waha A; de Waha S; Richardt G; Hennersdorf M; Empen K; Hambrecht R; Jung C; Böhm M; Pöss J; Strasser RH; Schneider S; Ouarrak T; Schuler G; Werdan K; Zeymer U; Thiele H Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 27378612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Pöss J; Köster J; Fuernau G; Eitel I; de Waha S; Ouarrak T; Lassus J; Harjola VP; Zeymer U; Thiele H; Desch S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 69(15):1913-1920. PubMed ID: 28408020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]