BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33306971)

  • 1. Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.
    Wu J; Logue T; Kaplan SJ; Melamed A; Tergas AI; Khoury-Collado F; Hou JY; St Clair CM; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):348-358.e5. PubMed ID: 33306971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in Use and Effect on Survival of Simple Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Sia TY; Chen L; Melamed A; Tergas AI; Khoury-Collado F; Hou JY; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 134(6):1132-1143. PubMed ID: 31764721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety analysis of non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 ~ IB1): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zeng S; Xiao S; Xu Y; Yang P; Hu C; Jin X; Liu L
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1337752. PubMed ID: 38745744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
    Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Melamed A; Margul DJ; Chen L; Keating NL; Del Carmen MG; Yang J; Seagle BL; Alexander A; Barber EL; Rice LW; Wright JD; Kocherginsky M; Shahabi S; Rauh-Hain JA
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 30379613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.
    Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Lopez Blanco A; Humberto Fregnani J; Lopes A; Perrotta M; Tsunoda AT; Cantú-de-León DF; Ramondetta LM; Manchana T; Crotzer DR; McNally OM; Riege M; Scambia G; Carvajal JM; Di Guilmi J; Rendon GJ; Ramalingam P; Fellman BM; Coleman RL; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 34493587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Frumovitz M; Sun CC; Schmeler KM; Deavers MT; Dos Reis R; Levenback CF; Ramirez PT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 19546764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radical hysterectomy compared with primary radiation for treatment of stage IB1 cervix cancer.
    Doll KM; Donnelly E; Helenowski I; Rosenbloom L; Small W; Schink JC; Lurain JR
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Feb; 37(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 22992622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Rosa DD; Medeiros LR; Edelweiss MI; Bozzetti MC; Pohlmann PR; Stein AT; Dickinson HO
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Jul; (3):CD005342. PubMed ID: 19588370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The potential for less radical surgery in women with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer.
    Bai H; Yuan F; Wang H; Chen J; Cui Q; Shen K
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 130(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 26070225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: A population-based study of long-term survival.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29776598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?
    Ramirez PT; Pareja R; Rendón GJ; Millan C; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):254-9. PubMed ID: 24041877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume and Survival for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Matsuo K; Shimada M; Yamaguchi S; Matoda M; Nakanishi T; Kikkawa F; Ohmichi M; Okamoto A; Sugiyama T; Mikami M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 133(6):1086-1098. PubMed ID: 31135722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.