These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33307458)

  • 1. Development and content validity evaluation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography: A mixed-method study.
    Boita J; Bolejko A; Zackrisson S; Wallis MG; Ikeda DM; Van Ongeval C; van Engen RE; Mackenzie A; Tingberg A; Bosmans H; Pijnappel R; Sechopoulos I; Broeders M
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109464. PubMed ID: 33307458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography using ROC analysis.
    Boita J; van Engen RE; Mackenzie A; Tingberg A; Bosmans H; Bolejko A; Zackrisson S; Wallis MG; Ikeda DM; van Ongeval C; Pijnappel R; Broeders M; Sechopoulos I
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109686. PubMed ID: 33819803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does image quality affect radiologists' perceived ability for image interpretation and lesion detection in digital mammography?
    Boita J; van Engen RE; Mackenzie A; Tingberg A; Bosmans H; Bolejko A; Zackrisson S; Wallis MG; Ikeda DM; Van Ongeval C; Pijnappel R; Broeders M; Sechopoulos I;
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5335-5343. PubMed ID: 33475774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for psychotherapeutic interventions in people with seizures: A mixed methods study.
    Michaelis R; Meyer S; Reuber M; Schöne C
    Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Oct; 99():106464. PubMed ID: 31421518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of a shoulder-specific quality of life questionnaire, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, for patients with scapula alata.
    Gadsboell J; Tibaek S
    JSES Open Access; 2017 Mar; 1(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30675536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.
    Almohanna AAS; Win KT; Meedya S; Vlahu-Gjorgievska E
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Aug; 164():104789. PubMed ID: 35597101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study on mastectomy samples to evaluate breast imaging quality and potential clinical relevance of differential phase contrast mammography.
    Hauser N; Wang Z; Kubik-Huch RA; Trippel M; Singer G; Hohl MK; Roessl E; Köhler T; van Stevendaal U; Wieberneit N; Stampanoni M
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 24141742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Content Validity of a Screening Instrument for Breast Cancer Early Detection Among Asian American Women: The Cultural Health and Screening Mammography Belief Scale.
    Zhao M; Conard PL
    J Nurs Meas; 2016 Dec; 24(3):356-364. PubMed ID: 28714442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility.
    Murakami R; Uchiyama N; Tani H; Yoshida T; Kumita S
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100207. PubMed ID: 33102630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
    Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing comfort in the epilepsy monitoring unit: Development of an instrument.
    Egger-Rainer A; Lorenzl S; Trinka E
    Epilepsy Behav; 2019 Feb; 91():53-58. PubMed ID: 29793841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.
    Gennaro G; Ballaminut A; Contento G
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3776-3787. PubMed ID: 28130611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Migraine co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain: Validation of questionnaires.
    Krøll LS; Hammarlund CS; Jensen RH; Gard G
    Scand J Pain; 2015 Jul; 8(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 29911635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.