442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33308213)
1. Can statistical adjustment guided by causal inference improve the accuracy of effect estimation? A simulation and empirical research based on meta-analyses of case-control studies.
Yan R; Liu T; Peng Y; Peng X
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(1):333. PubMed ID: 33308213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simulation study on matched case-control designs in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Li H; Yuan Z; Su P; Wang T; Yu Y; Sun X; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27543263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COVID-19 and the epistemology of epidemiological models at the dawn of AI.
Ellison GTH
Ann Hum Biol; 2020 Sep; 47(6):506-513. PubMed ID: 33228409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance.
Malec SA; Wei P; Bernstam EV; Boyce RD; Cohen T
J Biomed Inform; 2021 May; 117():103719. PubMed ID: 33716168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of methods to estimate the survivor average causal effect in the presence of missing data: a simulation study.
McGuinness MB; Kasza J; Karahalios A; Guymer RH; Finger RP; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):223. PubMed ID: 31795945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian identification of structural coefficients in causal models and the causal false-positive risk of confounders and colliders in linear Markovian models.
Kelter R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):58. PubMed ID: 35220960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity evaluation of indirect adjustment method for multiple unmeasured confounders: A simulation and empirical study.
Byun G; Kim H; Kim SY; Kim SS; Oh H; Lee JT
Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt A):111992. PubMed ID: 34487697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confounder selection strategies targeting stable treatment effect estimators.
Loh WW; Vansteelandt S
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(3):607-630. PubMed ID: 33150645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When does measurement error in covariates impact causal effect estimates? Analytic derivations of different scenarios and an empirical illustration.
Sengewald MA; Steiner PM; Pohl S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 May; 72(2):244-270. PubMed ID: 30345554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
Genbäck M; de Luna X
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Directed Acyclic Graphs for Oral Disease Research.
Akinkugbe AA; Sharma S; Ohrbach R; Slade GD; Poole C
J Dent Res; 2016 Jul; 95(8):853-9. PubMed ID: 27000052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].
Liu HX; Wang HB; Wang N
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 41(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 32344486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases.
Benasseur I; Talbot D; Durand M; Holbrook A; Matteau A; Potter BJ; Renoux C; Schnitzer ME; Tarride JÉ; Guertin JR
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Apr; 31(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 34953160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Janus face of statistical adjustment: confounders versus colliders.
Janszky I; Ahlbom A; Svensson AC
Eur J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 25(6):361-3. PubMed ID: 20449636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related.
Weed DL
Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 29(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 10869307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Should we adjust for a confounder if empirical and theoretical criteria yield contradictory results? A simulation study.
Lee PH
Sci Rep; 2014 Aug; 4():6085. PubMed ID: 25124526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
