These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33308684)

  • 1. Estimating group fixed effects in panel data with a binary dependent variable: How the LPM outperforms logistic regression in rare events data.
    Timoneda JC
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Jan; 93():102486. PubMed ID: 33308684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo simulations using extant data to mimic populations: Applications to the modified linear probability model and logistic regression.
    Jaccard J; Brinberg M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):450-465. PubMed ID: 33829812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design.
    Meaney C; Moineddin R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24461057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte carlo conditional inference for log-linear and logistic models: a survey of current methodology.
    Caffo BS; Booth JG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 12665206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the Probability of Rare Events Occurring Using a Local Model Averaging.
    Chen JH; Chen CS; Huang MF; Lin HC
    Risk Anal; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1855-1870. PubMed ID: 26857871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis.
    Gomila R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):700-709. PubMed ID: 32969684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation Methods for Mixed Logistic Models with Few Clusters.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):790-804. PubMed ID: 27802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmented Linear Regression Modelling of Time-Series of Binary Variables in Healthcare.
    Valsamis EM; Husband H; Chan GK
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():3478598. PubMed ID: 31885678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
    Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An algorithm for Monte Carlo estimation of genotype probabilities on complex pedigrees.
    Lin S; Thompson E; Wijsman E
    Ann Hum Genet; 1994 Oct; 58(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 7864590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
    Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
    van Smeden M; de Groot JA; Moons KG; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):163. PubMed ID: 27881078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ridge regression estimated linear probability model predictions of O-glycosylation in proteins with structural and sequence data.
    Gana R; Vasudevan S
    BMC Mol Cell Biol; 2019 Jun; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 31253080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models.
    Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4051-4065. PubMed ID: 31270850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of unmeasured baseline effect modification on estimates from an inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic model.
    Delaney JA; Platt RW; Suissa S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2009; 24(7):343-9. PubMed ID: 19418232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating multilevel logistic regression models when the number of clusters is low: a comparison of different statistical software procedures.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2010 Apr; 6(1):Article 16. PubMed ID: 20949128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating linear regression models in the presence of a censored independent variable.
    Austin PC; Hoch JS
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 14748036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hierarchical model for binary data with dependence between the design and outcome success probabilities.
    Todem D; Williams KP
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2967-88. PubMed ID: 19642075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies.
    Coull BA; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):294-301. PubMed ID: 11318172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.