These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33308897)

  • 21. Moral Convictions and Meat Consumption-A Comparative Study of the Animal Ethics Orientations of Consumers of Pork in Denmark, Germany, and Sweden.
    Lund TB; Denver S; Nordström J; Christensen T; Sandøe P
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33525675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability.
    Clonan A; Wilson P; Swift JA; Leibovici DG; Holdsworth M
    Public Health Nutr; 2015 Sep; 18(13):2446-56. PubMed ID: 25766000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare.
    Sødring M; Nafstad O; Håseth TT
    Acta Vet Scand; 2020 May; 62(1):22. PubMed ID: 32456651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dutch Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare.
    Mulder M; Zomer S
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(2):137-154. PubMed ID: 28166413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The attitude of German veterinarians towards farm animal welfare: results of a cluster analysis].
    Heise H; Kemper N; Theuvsen L
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2016; 129(5-6):225-33. PubMed ID: 27344915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history.
    Hoogland CT; de Boer J; Boersema JJ
    Appetite; 2005 Aug; 45(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 15949870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Livestock hauliers' attitudes, knowledge and current practices towards animal welfare, occupational wellbeing and transport risk factors: A Mexican survey.
    Valadez-Noriega M; Estévez-Moreno LX; Rayas-Amor AA; Rubio-Lozano MS; Galindo F; Miranda-de la Lama GC
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():76-84. PubMed ID: 30389001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Results of a national survey of US veterinary college faculty regarding attitudes toward farm animal welfare.
    Heleski CR; Mertig AG; Zanella AJ
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 May; 226(9):1538-46. PubMed ID: 15882007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spanish perspective on meat consumption and consumer attitudes.
    Font-I-Furnols M; Guerrero L
    Meat Sci; 2022 Sep; 191():108874. PubMed ID: 35667190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consumers' Attitudes towards Animal Suffering: A Systematic Review on Awareness, Willingness and Dietary Change.
    Fonseca RP; Sanchez-Sabate R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36498444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of informative claims on the attitude of Italian consumers towards cultured meat and relationship among variables used in an explicit approach.
    Piochi M; Micheloni M; Torri L
    Food Res Int; 2022 Jan; 151():110881. PubMed ID: 34980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment.
    Grunert KG; Sonntag WI; Glanz-Chanos V; Forum S
    Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():123-129. PubMed ID: 29175765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meat consumption and consumer attitudes in México: Can persistence lead to change?
    Estévez-Moreno LX; Miranda-de la Lama GC
    Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108943. PubMed ID: 35961125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perception of beef quality for Spanish and Brazilian consumers.
    Boito B; Lisbinski E; Campo MDM; Guerrero A; Resconi V; de Oliveira TE; Barcellos JOJ
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108312. PubMed ID: 33011632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.
    Liang Y; Xu Y; Lai D; Hua G; Huang D; Wang H; Li H; Han L
    Meat Sci; 2023 Jan; 195():108994. PubMed ID: 36240585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.
    McKendree MG; Croney CC; Widmar NJ
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):3161-73. PubMed ID: 24962533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Science and animal welfare in France and European Union: Rules, constraints, achievements.
    Jacques S
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 25060585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Considering how farm animal welfare concerns may contribute to more sustainable diets.
    de Boer J; Aiking H
    Appetite; 2022 Jan; 168():105786. PubMed ID: 34728249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consultation of pig farmers on the inclusion of some welfare outcome assessments within UK farm assurance.
    Mullan S; Butterworth A; Whay HR; Edwards S; Main DC
    Vet Rec; 2010 May; 166(22):678-80. PubMed ID: 20511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
    Schulze M; Spiller A; Risius A
    Meat Sci; 2021 Jul; 177():108494. PubMed ID: 33780871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.