These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33309351)

  • 1. Cyclic pressure applied to cows' teats by teatcup liners can be determined simply and noninvasively.
    Thompson PD; Dzidic A; Mein GA; Penry JF; Sanford SA; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 33309351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods of estimating liner compression.
    Leonardi S; Penry JF; Tangorra FM; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Oct; 98(10):6905-12. PubMed ID: 26254519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biological responses of the bovine teat to milking: information from measurements of milk flow-rate within single pulsation cycles.
    Williams DM; Mein GA; Brown MR
    J Dairy Res; 1981 Feb; 48(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7196411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressive load applied by the teatcup liner to the bovine teat.
    Mein GA; Williams DM; Thiel CC
    J Dairy Res; 1987 Aug; 54(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 3655068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing liner performance using on-farm milk meters.
    Penry JF; Leonardi S; Upton J; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6609-6618. PubMed ID: 27236765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of pulsation rest phase duration on teat end congestion.
    Upton J; Penry JF; Rasmussen MD; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 May; 99(5):3958-3965. PubMed ID: 26947293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
    Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
    Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of teatcup liner tension on teat canal keratin and teat condition in cows.
    Capuco AV; Wood DL; Quast JW
    J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 11037229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of manual and mechanical stimulation on oxytocin release and milking characteristics in Holstein cows milked 3 times daily.
    Watters RD; Bruckmaier RM; Crawford HM; Schuring N; Schukken YH; Galton DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1721-9. PubMed ID: 25582591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting mouthpiece chamber vacuum in machine milking.
    Borkhus M; Rønningen O
    J Dairy Res; 2003 Aug; 70(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12916822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions of vacuum, b-phase duration, and liner compression on milk flow rates in dairy cows.
    Bade RD; Reinemann DJ; Zucali M; Ruegg PL; Thompson PD
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):913-21. PubMed ID: 19233784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition.
    Ambord S; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3588-94. PubMed ID: 20655427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the use of an artificial teat to measure the forces applied by a milking machine teatcup liner.
    Adley NJ; Butler MC
    J Dairy Res; 1994 Nov; 61(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 7829752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The control of milk flow through the teats of dairy cows.
    Butler MC; Hillerton JE; Grindal RJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Apr; 75(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 1578016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Milking performance and udder health of cows milked with two different liners.
    Rasmussen MD; Frimer ES; Kaartinen L; Jensen NE
    J Dairy Res; 1998 Aug; 65(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 9718489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short communication: Effect of vacuum and ratio on the performance of a monoblock silicone milking liner.
    Spencer SB; Shin JW; Rogers GW; Cooper JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1725-8. PubMed ID: 17369212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.