305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33309901)
1. SEPIA-Susceptibility mapping pipeline tool for phase images.
Chan KS; Marques JP
Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 227():117611. PubMed ID: 33309901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ironsmith: An automated pipeline for QSM-based data analyses.
Zachariou V; Bauer CE; Powell DK; Gold BT
Neuroimage; 2022 Apr; 249():118835. PubMed ID: 34936923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods on evaluating radiation-induced cerebral microbleeds and basal ganglia at 3T and 7T.
Chen Y; Genc O; Poynton CB; Banerjee S; Hess CP; Lupo JM
NMR Biomed; 2022 May; 35(5):e4666. PubMed ID: 35075701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decompose quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to sub-voxel diamagnetic and paramagnetic components based on gradient-echo MRI data.
Chen J; Gong NJ; Chaim KT; Otaduy MCG; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118477. PubMed ID: 34403742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-atlas tool for automated segmentation of brain gray matter nuclei and quantification of their magnetic susceptibility.
Li X; Chen L; Kutten K; Ceritoglu C; Li Y; Kang N; Hsu JT; Qiao Y; Wei H; Liu C; Miller MI; Mori S; Yousem DM; van Zijl PCM; Faria AV
Neuroimage; 2019 May; 191():337-349. PubMed ID: 30738207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) Algorithms: Mathematical Rationale and Computational Implementations.
Kee Y; Liu Z; Zhou L; Dimov A; Cho J; de Rochefort L; Seo JK; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2531-2545. PubMed ID: 28885147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning-based single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstruction without brain extraction.
Wei H; Cao S; Zhang Y; Guan X; Yan F; Yeom KW; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116064. PubMed ID: 31377323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the influence of zero-padding on the nonlinear operations in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.
Eskreis-Winkler S; Zhou D; Liu T; Gupta A; Gauthier SA; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 35():154-159. PubMed ID: 27587225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. APART-QSM: An improved sub-voxel quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation using an iterative data fitting method.
Li Z; Feng R; Liu Q; Feng J; Lao G; Zhang M; Li J; Zhang Y; Wei H
Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 274():120148. PubMed ID: 37127191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging beta amyloid aggregation and iron accumulation in Alzheimer's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping MRI.
Gong NJ; Dibb R; Bulk M; van der Weerd L; Liu C
Neuroimage; 2019 May; 191():176-185. PubMed ID: 30739060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative susceptibility mapping for susceptibility source separation with adaptive relaxometric constant estimation (QSM-ARCS) from solely gradient-echo data.
Kan H; Uchida Y; Kawaguchi S; Kasai H; Hiwatashi A; Ueki Y
Neuroimage; 2024 Aug; 296():120676. PubMed ID: 38852804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MoDL-QSM: Model-based deep learning for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Feng R; Zhao J; Wang H; Yang B; Feng J; Shi Y; Zhang M; Liu C; Zhang Y; Zhuang J; Wei H
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118376. PubMed ID: 34246768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-echo dipole inversion for magnetic susceptibility mapping.
Kames C; Doucette J; Rauscher A
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2391-2401. PubMed ID: 36695283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QSMxT: Robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Stewart AW; Robinson SD; O'Brien K; Jin J; Widhalm G; Hangel G; Walls A; Goodwin J; Eckstein K; Tourell M; Morgan C; Narayanan A; Barth M; Bollmann S
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Mar; 87(3):1289-1300. PubMed ID: 34687073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accelerating quantitative susceptibility and R2* mapping using incoherent undersampling and deep neural network reconstruction.
Gao Y; Cloos M; Liu F; Crozier S; Pike GB; Sun H
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118404. PubMed ID: 34280526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R
Rua C; Clarke WT; Driver ID; Mougin O; Morgan AT; Clare S; Francis S; Muir KW; Wise RG; Carpenter TA; Williams GB; Rowe JB; Bowtell R; Rodgers CT
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117358. PubMed ID: 32916289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods for iron-sensitive susceptibility imaging at 7T: An evaluation in healthy subjects and patients with Huntington's disease.
Yao J; Morrison MA; Jakary A; Avadiappan S; Chen Y; Luitjens J; Glueck J; Driscoll T; Geschwind MD; Nelson AB; Villanueva-Meyer JE; Hess CP; Lupo JM
Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119788. PubMed ID: 36476567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
