These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33310650)

  • 1. Detection and response to critical lead vehicle deceleration events with peripheral vision: Glance response times are independent of visual eccentricity.
    Svärd M; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105853. PubMed ID: 33310650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steering or braking avoidance response in SHRP2 rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A decision tree approach.
    Sarkar A; Hickman JS; McDonald AD; Huang W; Vogelpohl T; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106055. PubMed ID: 33691227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational modeling of driver pre-crash brake response, with and without off-road glances: Parameterization using real-world crashes and near-crashes.
    Svärd M; Markkula G; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106433. PubMed ID: 34673380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of off-path glances: A quantitative analysis of rear-end conflicts involving Chinese professional truck drivers as the striking partners.
    Pipkorn L; Bianchi Piccinini G
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():259-266. PubMed ID: 32199571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The correlation between drivers' road familiarity and glance behavior using real vehicle experimental data and mathematical models.
    Huang J; Hu Y; Hu L; Guo G; Gao K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 38709142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of momentary visual disruption on hazard anticipation and awareness in driving.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24697569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems.
    Noble AM; Miles M; Perez MA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105959. PubMed ID: 33385962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looking out or Looking Away?-Exploring the Impact of Driving With a Passenger on Young Drivers' Eye Glance Behavior.
    Mehrotra S; Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1306-1322. PubMed ID: 35466736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of drivers' deceleration behavior based on naturalistic driving data.
    Li S; Li P; Yao Y; Han X; Xu Y; Chen L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31986072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.
    Simons-Morton BG; Guo F; Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; Pradhan AK
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5 Suppl):S61-7. PubMed ID: 24759443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
    Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of billboards on driver visual behavior: a systematic literature review.
    Decker JS; Stannard SJ; McManus B; Wittig SM; Sisiopiku VP; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():234-9. PubMed ID: 25000270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.