129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3331162)
1. [Videodensitometric assessment of right and left ventricular functions by digital subtraction angiography].
Ikeda H; Yoshiga O; Shibao K; Hidaka Y; Okabe K; Yoh M; Hiyamuta K; Sugi K; Ohkita Y; Koga Y
J Cardiol; 1987 Sep; 17(3):587-95. PubMed ID: 3331162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of single plane videodensitometry-based right ventricular ejection fraction in right and left anterior oblique views to biplane geometry-based right ventricular ejection fraction.
Cohen M; Monsen C; Francis X; Sherman W; Ambrose JA; Teichholz LE; Fuster V
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 10(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3298359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Videodensitometric ejection fraction from intravenous digital subtraction right ventriculograms: correlation with first pass radionuclide ejection fraction.
Detrano R; MacIntyre W; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Butters K; Withrow S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Jun; 5(6):1377-81. PubMed ID: 3889098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Densitometric regional ejection fraction: a new three-dimensional index of regional left ventricular function--comparison with geometric methods.
Chappuis FP; Widmann TF; Nicod P; Peterson KL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jan; 11(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 3275707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function by densitometric analysis of digital-subtraction ventriculograms: correlation with myocardial systolic shortening in dogs.
Chappuis F; Widmann T; Guth B; Nicod P; Peterson KL
Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 3276410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Videodensitometric ejection fractions from intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculograms: correlation with conventional direct contrast and radionuclide ventriculography.
Detrano R; MacIntyre WJ; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Jones H; Butters K; Leatherman J
Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 3883414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction estimated by two-dimensional echocardiography].
Cui W; Du BJ; Wang YF
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1989 Dec; 17(6):350-1, 382-3. PubMed ID: 2637131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of digital subtraction contrast echocardiography in enhancing left ventricular endocardial definition.
Rovai D; Nissen SE; Elion JL; Distante A; DeMaria AN
Am Heart J; 1987 Jun; 113(6):1437-44. PubMed ID: 3296718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: reliability of densitometric determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction].
Machnig T; Lehmkuhl H; Reynen K; Engels G; Eicker B; Barth K; Bachmann K
Z Kardiol; 1993 Jul; 82(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 8379245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On-line evaluation of systolic performance by densitometry in digital left ventriculography.
Lehmkuhl H; Altstidl R; Machnig T; Blunck B; Barth K; Bachmann K
Clin Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):729-36. PubMed ID: 8874993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise.
Birchler B; Hess OM; Murakami T; Niederer P; Anliker M; Krayenbuehl HP
Eur Heart J; 1985 Jun; 6(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 3899652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multigated blood-pool tomography: new method for the assessment of left ventricular function.
Gill JB; Moore RH; Tamaki N; Miller DD; Barlai-Kovach M; Yasuda T; Boucher CA; Strauss HW
J Nucl Med; 1986 Dec; 27(12):1916-24. PubMed ID: 3491195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometric determination of left ventricular volume from gated blood-pool studies using a slant-hole collimator.
Uren RF; Newman HN; Hutton BF; Cormack J; Bernstein L; Allen L; Dyer I
Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):541-5. PubMed ID: 6836136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography.
Greenbaum RA; Evans TR
Br Heart J; 1984 Feb; 51(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 6362689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Videodensitometric analysis of venous digital angiography of the left ventricle: application to the measurement of the ventricular ejection fraction and volumes].
Brenot P; Angel CY; Vuthien H; Letienne G; Gaux JC
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Apr; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 3287304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a digital videodensitometric program analysis for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction.
Gaux JC; Vuthien H; Letienne G; Angel CY; Pernes JM; Raynaud A; Brenot P
Br J Radiol; 1987 Jul; 60(715):693-9. PubMed ID: 3304510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Left atrial function in ischemic heart disease assessed by intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Tomizawa T; Ishimitsu T; Takeda T; Ajisaka R; Ogawa T; Sugishita Y; Akisada M; Ito I
J Cardiol; 1992; 22(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 1343625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography: effect of dose and administration mode of contrast medium, and comparison with direct ventriculography].
Kuribayashi S; Ootaki M; Matsuyama S; Kanemoto N; Furuya H
J Cardiogr; 1985 Sep; 15(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 3915507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
