151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33314392)
1. Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals.
Wang X; Wang X; Ge P; Zhao X; Chen C; Hu S; Ren L
J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Feb; 35(2):e23638. PubMed ID: 33314392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation and optimization of criteria for manual smear review following automated blood cell analysis in a large university hospital.
Pratumvinit B; Wongkrajang P; Reesukumal K; Klinbua C; Niamjoy P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 137(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 23451752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the performance of three panels rules of blood smear review criteria on an Italian multicenter evaluation.
Pipitone S; Germagnoli L; Da Rin G; Di Fabio A; Fanelli A; Fiorini F; Francione S; Marini A; Papa A; Benegiamo A; Lari T; Siviero F; Lorubbio M; Borin M; Seghezzi M; Ciardelli ML; Dima F; Gioia M; Buoro S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Dec; 39(6):645-652. PubMed ID: 28975714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application and development of review criteria on Sysmex XT-2100 in Chinese at a large third-grade class-A hospital.
Yue J; Cong Y; Wang C; Ma J; Ma X; Lan Y; Xiang D
Clin Lab; 2013; 59(7-8):789-94. PubMed ID: 24133907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines.
Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the 72-hour rule based on "Blast/Abn Lymph" flag on Sysmex XN-10 optimize the workflow in hematology laboratory?
Paridaens H; Sabor L; Simar J; Ronez E; Cornet E; Defour JP
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2019 Aug; 77(4):422-428. PubMed ID: 31418703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infectious mononucleosis in an outpatient population: diagnostic utility of 2 automated hematology analyzers and the sensitivity and specificity of Hoagland's criteria in heterophile-positive patients.
Brigden ML; Au S; Thompson S; Brigden S; Doyle P; Tsaparas Y
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Oct; 123(10):875-81. PubMed ID: 10506437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Refining peripheral blood smear review rules for neonatal inpatients in a South African academic laboratory.
Vaughan J; Alli N; Mannaru K; Sedick Q
Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Aug; 38(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 27087063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined hematologic parameters to optimize review criteria on XE-5000.
Fu L; Guo X; Li X; Peng L; Luo H; Xu Y; Zeng F
Int J Lab Hematol; 2020 Apr; 42(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 31820568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter study of autoverification methods of hematology analysis.
Zhao X; Wang XF; Wang JB; Lu XJ; Zhao YW; Li CB; Wang BH; Wei J; Guo P; Xiao JP; Wang JH; Yang XL
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2016; 30(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 27358150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Designing and Validating Autoverification Rules for Hematology Analysis in Sysmex XN-9000 Hematology System.
Fu Q; Ye C; Han B; Zhan X; Chen K; Huang F; Miao L; Yang S; Wang W
Clin Lab; 2020 Apr; 66(4):. PubMed ID: 32255287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in detecting blasts between ADVIA 2120 and Beckman-Coulter LH750 hematology analyzers.
Shelat SG; Canfield W; Shibutani S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 2):113-6. PubMed ID: 20447241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following four different series of hematology analyzer in a Chinese large scale hospital.
Cui W; Wu W; Wang X; Wang G; Hao YY; Chen Y; Luo D; Shou WL; Zhang S; Xiang XF; Si YZ; Chen Q; Cai H; Li T; Shen H; Shang K; Zhang YQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(22):3231-7. PubMed ID: 21163121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of laboratory workflow in clinical hematology laboratory with reduced manual slide review: comparison between Sysmex XE-2100 and ABX Pentra DX120.
Hur M; Cho JH; Kim H; Hong MH; Moon HW; Yun YM; Kim JQ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Aug; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 21418541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?
Comar SR; Malvezzi M; Pasquini R
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter; 2014; 36(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 25031063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation rules for blood smear revision after automated hematological testing using Mindray CAL-8000.
Buoro S; Mecca T; Seghezzi M; Manenti B; Azzarà G; Ottomano C; Lippi G
J Clin Lab Anal; 2017 Jul; 31(4):. PubMed ID: 27709664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Sysmex Xe-2100 hematology analyzer in hospital use.
Nakul-Aquaronne D; Sudaka-Sammarcelli I; Ferrero-Vacher C; Starck B; Bayle J
J Clin Lab Anal; 2003; 17(4):113-23. PubMed ID: 12784259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.
Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
