BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33314410)

  • 1. Combination of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) with sonographic and demographic characteristics in preoperative prediction of recurrence or progression of endometrial cancer.
    Eriksson LSE; Nastic D; Lindqvist PG; Imboden S; Järnbert-Pettersson H; Carlson JW; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 58(3):457-468. PubMed ID: 33314410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer.
    Talhouk A; McConechy MK; Leung S; Yang W; Lum A; Senz J; Boyd N; Pike J; Anglesio M; Kwon JS; Karnezis AN; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
    Cancer; 2017 Mar; 123(5):802-813. PubMed ID: 28061006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of ultrasound strategies to assess tumor extension and to predict high-risk endometrial cancer in women from the prospective IETA (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis)-4 cohort.
    Verbakel JY; Mascilini F; Wynants L; Fischerova D; Testa AC; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Cibula D; Lindqvist PG; Fruscio R; Haak LA; Opolskiene G; Alcazar JL; Mais V; Carlson JW; Sladkevicius P; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Bosch TVD; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 55(1):115-124. PubMed ID: 31225683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular characterization in the prediction of disease extent in endometrial carcinoma.
    Kolehmainen AM; Pasanen AM; Koivisto-Korander RL; Bützow RC; Loukovaara MJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():478-483. PubMed ID: 33189427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of 108 patients with endometrial carcinoma using the PROMISE classification and additional genetic analyses for MMR-D.
    Timmerman S; Van Rompuy AS; Van Gorp T; Vanden Bempt I; Brems H; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Han SN; Neven P; Victoor J; Laenen A; Vergote I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 157(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 31980219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment.
    Talhouk A; Hoang LN; McConechy MK; Nakonechny Q; Leo J; Cheng A; Leung S; Yang W; Lum A; Köbel M; Lee CH; Soslow RA; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Oct; 143(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 27421752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of DNA Ploidy in the ProMisE molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer.
    Proctor L; Pradhan M; Leung S; Cheng A; Lee CH; Soslow RA; Gilks CB; Talhouk A; McAlpine JM; Danielsen HE; Hoang LN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 146(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 28647100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular classification defines outcomes and opportunities in young women with endometrial carcinoma.
    Britton H; Huang L; Lum A; Leung S; Shum K; Kale M; Burleigh A; Senz J; Yang W; McConechy M; Kommoss S; Brucker S; Talhouk A; Gilks CB; McAlpine JN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jun; 153(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 30922603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical features of ProMisE groups identify different phenotypes of patients with endometrial cancer.
    Raffone A; Travaglino A; Gabrielli O; Micheli M; Zuccalà V; Bitonti G; Camastra C; Gargiulo V; Insabato L; Zullo F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jun; 303(6):1393-1400. PubMed ID: 33754186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative MR imaging for ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO classification of endometrial cancer.
    Lavaud P; Fedida B; Canlorbe G; Bendifallah S; Darai E; Thomassin-Naggara I
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Jun; 99(6):387-396. PubMed ID: 29472031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clue towards improving the European Society of Medical Oncology risk group classification in apparent early stage endometrial cancer? Impact of lymphovascular space invasion.
    Bendifallah S; Canlorbe G; Raimond E; Hudry D; Coutant C; Graesslin O; Touboul C; Huguet F; Cortez A; Daraï E; Ballester M
    Br J Cancer; 2014 May; 110(11):2640-6. PubMed ID: 24809776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Volumetry in Predicting Myometrial Invasion, Lymphovascular Space Invasion, and Tumor Grade: Is It Valuable in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I Endometrial Cancer?
    Sahin H; Sarioglu FC; Bagci M; Karadeniz T; Uluer H; Sanci M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 May; 28(4):666-674. PubMed ID: 29697491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical application of TCGA molecular classification in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma].
    Du NN; Liu Y; Ren CX; Wang YX; Du J; Yang J; Liu CR
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 48(8):596-603. PubMed ID: 31422589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histopathological characterization of ProMisE molecular groups of endometrial cancer.
    Raffone A; Travaglino A; Mascolo M; Carotenuto C; Guida M; Mollo A; Insabato L; Zullo F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 157(1):252-259. PubMed ID: 31932106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound-based risk model for preoperative prediction of lymph-node metastases in women with endometrial cancer: model-development study.
    Eriksson LSE; Epstein E; Testa AC; Fischerova D; Valentin L; Sladkevicius P; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Fruscio R; Haak LA; Opolskiene G; Mascilini F; Alcazar JL; Van Holsbeke C; Chiappa V; Bourne T; Lindqvist PG; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Verbakel JY; Van den Bosch T; Wynants L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 56(3):443-452. PubMed ID: 31840873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pilot study prospectively evaluating the use of the measurement of preoperative sonographic endometrial thickness in postmenopausal patients with endometrial cancer.
    Eitan R; Saenz CC; Venkatraman ES; Hann L; Bach A; Gretz E; Barakat RR; Chi DS
    Menopause; 2005; 12(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15668597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver Agreement in Endometrial Carcinoma Histotype Diagnosis Varies Depending on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based Molecular Subgroup.
    Hoang LN; Kinloch MA; Leo JM; Grondin K; Lee CH; Ewanowich C; Köbel M; Cheng A; Talhouk A; McConechy M; Huntsman DG; McAlpine JN; Soslow RA; Gilks CB
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 28079598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular profile is a strong predictor of the pattern of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer.
    Luzarraga Aznar A; Bebia V; López-Gil C; Villafranca-Magdalena B; Salazar-Huayna L; Castellvi J; Colàs E; Gil-Moreno A; Cabrera S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 May; 34(5):659-666. PubMed ID: 38378696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves diagnostic performance in endometrial cancer staging.
    Green RW; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 56(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 31647145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative tumor size at MRI predicts deep myometrial invasion, lymph node metastases, and patient outcome in endometrial carcinomas.
    Ytre-Hauge S; Husby JA; Magnussen IJ; Werner HM; Salvesen ØO; Bjørge L; Trovik J; Stefansson IM; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 25628109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.