These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33315127)

  • 1. Adaptation of reach action to a novel force-field is not predicted by acuity of dynamic proprioception in either older or younger adults.
    Kitchen NM; Miall RC
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Feb; 239(2):557-574. PubMed ID: 33315127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proprioceptive deficits in inactive older adults are not reflected in fast targeted reaching movements.
    Kitchen NM; Miall RC
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):531-545. PubMed ID: 30478636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of proprioceptive acuity variability on motor adaptation in older adults.
    Lei Y; Wang J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):599-608. PubMed ID: 29255917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.
    Miall RC; Kitchen NM; Nam SH; Lefumat H; Renault AG; Ørstavik K; Cole JD; Sarlegna FR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2137-2155. PubMed ID: 29779050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does proprioceptive acuity influence the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation in young and older adults?
    Vandevoorde K; Orban de Xivry JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Oct; 126(4):1326-1344. PubMed ID: 34346739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Force-field adaptation without proprioception: can vision be used to model limb dynamics?
    Sarlegna FR; Malfait N; Bringoux L; Bourdin C; Vercher JL
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 19695273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration.
    Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 191():91-9. PubMed ID: 21741546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.
    Tsay JS; Kim HE; Parvin DE; Stover AR; Ivry RB
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1307-1321. PubMed ID: 33656948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of visuomotor adaptation on proprioceptive localization: the contributions of perceptual and motor changes.
    Clayton HA; Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2073-86. PubMed ID: 24623356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of online visual feedback on motor acquisition and retention when learning to reach in a force field.
    Batcho CS; Gagné M; Bouyer LJ; Roy JS; Mercier C
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():267-275. PubMed ID: 27646292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements.
    Scheidt RA; Conditt MA; Secco EL; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3200-13. PubMed ID: 15659526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalization of force-field adaptation in proprioceptively-deafferented subjects.
    Lefumat HZ; Miall RC; Cole JD; Bringoux L; Bourdin C; Vercher JL; Sarlegna FR
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar; 616():160-5. PubMed ID: 26826606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proprioceptive Acuity is Enhanced During Arm Movements Compared to When the Arm is Stationary: A Study of Young and Older Adults.
    Coffman CR; Capaday C; Darling WG
    Neuroscience; 2021 Jul; 466():222-234. PubMed ID: 33905823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Force control in the absence of visual and tactile feedback.
    Mugge W; Abbink DA; Schouten AC; van der Helm FC; Arendzen JH; Meskers CG
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(4):635-45. PubMed ID: 23223780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalization patterns for reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration differ after visuomotor learning.
    Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 114(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 25972587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manual aiming in healthy aging: does proprioceptive acuity make the difference?
    Helsen WF; Van Halewyck F; Levin O; Boisgontier MP; Lavrysen A; Elliott D
    Age (Dordr); 2016 Apr; 38(2):45. PubMed ID: 27044301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visuo-proprioceptive recalibration and the sensorimotor map.
    Block HJ; Liu Y
    J Neurophysiol; 2023 May; 129(5):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 37125747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach.
    Judkins T; Scheidt RA
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 111(4):868-87. PubMed ID: 24259549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Force field adaptation can be learned using vision in the absence of proprioceptive error.
    Melendez-Calderon A; Masia L; Gassert R; Sandini G; Burdet E
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Jun; 19(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21652280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.
    Zbib B; Henriques DY; Cressman EK
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2201-13. PubMed ID: 27014777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.