247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33315230)
1. Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Aiolfi A; Lombardo F; Bonitta G; Danelli P; Bona D
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):909-922. PubMed ID: 33315230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach.
Aiolfi A; Tornese S; Bonitta G; Rausa E; Micheletto G; Bona D
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Jun; 15(6):985-994. PubMed ID: 31104958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of different surgical approaches for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Kamarajah SK; Bundred JR; Marc OS; Jiao LR; Hilal MA; Manas DM; White SA
HPB (Oxford); 2020 Mar; 22(3):329-339. PubMed ID: 31676255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.
Aiolfi A; Cavalli M; Micheletto G; Lombardo F; Bonitta G; Morlacchi A; Bruni PG; Campanelli G; Bona D
Hernia; 2019 Jun; 23(3):473-484. PubMed ID: 31089835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Nickel F; Haney CM; Kowalewski KF; Probst P; Limen EF; Kalkum E; Diener MK; Strobel O; Müller-Stich BP; Hackert T
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 30973388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review.
Doula C; Kostakis ID; Damaskos C; Machairas N; Vardakostas DV; Feretis T; Felekouras E
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Feb; 26(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 26836625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen K; Liu XL; Pan Y; Maher H; Wang XF
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 29969999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis of Comparative Cohort Studies.
Lyu Y; Cheng Y; Wang B; Xu Y; Du W
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Apr; 29(4):449-457. PubMed ID: 30256164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
Podda M; Gerardi C; Di Saverio S; Marino MV; Davies RJ; Pellino G; Pisanu A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2390-2409. PubMed ID: 32072286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review.
Wang M; Cai H; Meng L; Cai Y; Wang X; Li Y; Peng B
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():139-146. PubMed ID: 27664556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the Robotic Assisted Hybrid Approach Increasing the MIS efficiency for Pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Copăescu C; Dumbravă B
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2023 Jun; 118(3):302-313. PubMed ID: 37480356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative and oncological outcomes following minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma.
Sun R; Yu J; Zhang Y; Liang Z; Han X
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2273-2285. PubMed ID: 32632485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic approach.
Aiolfi A; Nosotti M; Micheletto G; Khor D; Bonitta G; Perali C; Marin J; Biraghi T; Bona D
Surgery; 2021 Feb; 169(2):436-446. PubMed ID: 33097244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses.
Kim H; Choi SH; Jang JY; Choi M; Lee JH; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):311-321. PubMed ID: 34773395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the head of pancreas; 10 cases for a single center experience.
Caruso F; Alessandri G; Cesana G; Castello G; Uccelli M; Ciccarese F; Giorgi R; Villa R; Scotto B; Olmi S
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Oct; 21(17):3745-3753. PubMed ID: 28975996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective cohort study on short-term outcomes of 3D-laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with stented pancreaticogastrostomy.
Topal H; Jaekers J; Geers J; Topal B
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1203-1212. PubMed ID: 36163561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]