247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33315230)
21. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.
Kabir T; Tan HL; Syn NL; Wu EJ; Kam JH; Goh BKP
Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):476-489. PubMed ID: 34454723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: A propensity score-matched study.
Wang SE; Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM
Surgery; 2018 Dec; 164(6):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 30093277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety and efficacy of robot-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of multiple worldwide centers.
Zhang W; Huang Z; Zhang J; Che X
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):893-907. PubMed ID: 33159662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Open and minimally invasive pancreatic neoplasms enucleation: a systematic review.
Dalla Valle R; Cremaschi E; Lamecchi L; Guerini F; Rosso E; Iaria M
Surg Endosc; 2019 Oct; 33(10):3192-3199. PubMed ID: 31363894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best "Choice"? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies.
Ricci C; Casadei R; Taffurelli G; Pacilio CA; Ricciardiello M; Minni F
World J Surg; 2018 Mar; 42(3):788-805. PubMed ID: 28799046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy in laparoscopic and robotic surgery: a single-center experience in China.
Xu DB; Zhao ZM; Xu Y; Liu R
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1703-1712. PubMed ID: 32297052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary nonampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang W; Liu Q; Zhao ZM; Tan XL; Wang ZZ; Zhang KD; Liu R
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Feb; 407(1):167-173. PubMed ID: 34471952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy].
Lan X; Xi H; Zhang K; Cui J; Li M; Chen L
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 28226353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Lyu Y; Cheng Y; Wang B; Zhao S; Chen L
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2020 Sep; 31(1):104-112. PubMed ID: 32890249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy as minimally invasive surgery for periampullary tumors: a comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Mendoza AS; Han HS; Yoon YS; Cho JY; Choi Y
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(12):819-24. PubMed ID: 26455716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.
Mazzola M; Giani A; Crippa J; Morini L; Zironda A; Bertoglio CL; De Martini P; Magistro C; Ferrari G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 47(3 Pt B):674-680. PubMed ID: 33176959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Peng L; Lin S; Li Y; Xiao W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3085-3097. PubMed ID: 27928665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: An Up-To-Date System Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ouyang L; Zhang J; Feng Q; Zhang Z; Ma H; Zhang G
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():834382. PubMed ID: 35280811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: results from Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):939-946. PubMed ID: 33068270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Totally laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open surgery for periampullary neoplasms: separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Shin SH; Kim YJ; Song KB; Kim SR; Hwang DW; Lee JH; Park KM; Lee YJ; Jun E; Kim SC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3459-3474. PubMed ID: 28039645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):377-383. PubMed ID: 30963260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach.
Rausa E; Kelly ME; Asti E; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Bonavina L
Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 30456506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Survival and Robotic Approach for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score-Match Study.
Rosemurgy AS; Ross SB; Espeut A; Nguyen D; Crespo K; Syblis C; Vasanthakumar P; Sucandy I
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Apr; 234(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 35290288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
