BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33315360)

  • 1. Comprehensive Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part I: Effects on Apical Rod Strain: An In Vitro and In Silico Biomechanical Study.
    Gelb DE; Tareen J; Jazini E; Ludwig SC; Harris JA; Amin DB; Wang W; Van Horn MR; Patel PD; Mirabile BA; Bucklen BS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 33315360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comprehensive In Silico Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part II: Effects on Lumbosacral Rod and Screw Strain.
    Jazini E; Gelb DE; Tareen J; Ludwig SC; Harris JA; Amin DB; Wang W; Van Horn MR; Patel PD; Mirabile BA; Bucklen BS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(1):E12-E22. PubMed ID: 33315361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Supplemental Short Pre-Contoured Accessory Rods and Cobalt Chrome Alloy Posterior Rods Reduces Primary Rod Strain and Range of Motion Across the Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.
    Hallager DW; Gehrchen M; Dahl B; Harris JA; Gudipally M; Jenkins S; Wu AM; Bucklen BS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E388-95. PubMed ID: 27018904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal satellite rod constructs to mitigate rod failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element study.
    Seyed Vosoughi A; Joukar A; Kiapour A; Parajuli D; Agarwal AK; Goel VK; Zavatsky J
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):931-941. PubMed ID: 30414992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
    Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.
    La Barbera L; Wilke HJ; Liebsch C; Villa T; Luca A; Galbusera F; Brayda-Bruno M
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Jan; 29(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 31414289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Versus 4 Rods Across the Cervicothoracic Junction in a Human Cadaveric Model.
    Pivazyan G; Winters CG; Brooks DM; Sandhu FA; Cunningham BW
    Neurosurgery; 2024 Jan; 94(1):217-225. PubMed ID: 37706689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematic efficacy of supplemental anterior lumbar interbody fusion at lumbosacral levels in thoracolumbosacral deformity correction with and without pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L3: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Dahl BT; Harris JA; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S; Bucklen BS
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2773-2781. PubMed ID: 28770402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    La Barbera L; Brayda-Bruno M; Liebsch C; Villa T; Luca A; Galbusera F; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2357-2366. PubMed ID: 29740675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supplementary delta-rod configurations provide superior stiffness and reduced rod stress compared to traditional multiple-rod configurations after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element study.
    Berjano P; Xu M; Damilano M; Scholl T; Lamartina C; Jekir M; Galbusera F
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2198-2207. PubMed ID: 31129763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of multi-rod constructs to stabilize an S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element analysis.
    Shekouhi N; Tripathi S; Goel VK; Theologis AA
    Spine Deform; 2024 Mar; 12(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 38032447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does number of rods matter? 4-, 5-, and 6-rods across a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element analysis.
    Shekouhi N; Vosoughi AS; Goel VK; Theologis AA
    Spine Deform; 2023 May; 11(3):535-543. PubMed ID: 36484928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model.
    Shah KN; Walker G; Koruprolu SC; Daniels AH
    Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2018 Mar; 10(1):7541. PubMed ID: 29770179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity.
    Smith JS; Shaffrey E; Klineberg E; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Schwab FJ; Protopsaltis T; Scheer JK; Mundis GM; Fu KM; Gupta MC; Hostin R; Deviren V; Kebaish K; Hart R; Burton DC; Line B; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):994-1003. PubMed ID: 25325175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Would CoCr rods provide better correctional forces than stainless steel or titanium for rigid scoliosis curves?
    Serhan H; Mhatre D; Newton P; Giorgio P; Sturm P
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):E70-4. PubMed ID: 22832558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: A finite element study.
    Januszewski J; Beckman JM; Harris JE; Turner AW; Yen CP; Uribe JS
    Surg Neurol Int; 2017; 8():207. PubMed ID: 28966814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical stability of transverse connectors in the setting of a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Paik H; Cardoso MJ; Bernstock JD; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1629-35. PubMed ID: 25771755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spinal rod gripping capacity: how do 5.5/6.0-mm dual-diameter screws compare?
    Kluck DG; Farnsworth CL; Jeffords ME; Marino NE; Yaszay B; Upasani VV; Newton PO
    Spine Deform; 2020 Feb; 8(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31960354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Study Between Cobalt Chrome and Titanium Alloy Rods for Multilevel Spinal Fusion: Proximal Junctional Kyphosis More Frequently Occurred in Patients Having Cobalt Chrome Rods.
    Han S; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():404-409. PubMed ID: 28427980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
    Neurosurgery; 2011 Jul; 69(1):164-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 21336218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.