These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers. Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices. Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers. Cheng SM; Zhang JS; Shao X; Wu ZT; Li TT; Wang P; Lin JH; Yu AY Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 260(7):2271-2281. PubMed ID: 35171331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of 2 biometers using swept-source OCT technology. Panthier C; Rouger H; Gozlan Y; Moran S; Gatinel D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 34034291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of refractive outcome with postoperative anterior chamber depth measured with 3 optical biometers. Mao Y; Li J; Qin Y; Xu Y; Liu L; Cheng H; Wu M Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 44(1):62. PubMed ID: 38345699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Axial length measurement failure rates using optical biometry based on swept-source OCT in cataractous eyes. Tañá-Rivero P; Tañá-Sanz S; Pastor-Pascual F; Ruiz-Mesa R; Montés-Micó R Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Aug; 19(8):633-640. PubMed ID: 36062739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients. Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two new integrated SS-OCT tomography and biometry devices. Sorkin N; Achiron A; Abumanhal M; Abulafia A; Cohen E; Gutfreund S; Mandelblum J; Varssano D; Levinger E J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 35608316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross-sectional study. An Y; Kang EK; Kim H; Kang MJ; Byun YS; Joo CK BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 30678658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos Porwolik M; Porwolik A; Mrukwa-Kominek E Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jun; 60(7):. PubMed ID: 39064485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Fişuş AD; Hirnschall ND; Ruiss M; Pilwachs C; Georgiev S; Findl O J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices. Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer. Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]