These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33315731)
21. Effect of pharmacological pupil dilation on measurements and iol power calculation made using the new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):859-865. PubMed ID: 27793471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of biometry measurements and intraocular lens power prediction between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers. Sorkin N; Zadok T; Barrett GD; Chasid O; Abulafia A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 May; 49(5):460-466. PubMed ID: 36719441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT. Galzignato A; Lupardi E; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ocular Biometric Characteristics Measured by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography in Individuals Undergoing Cataract Surgery. Wasser LM; Tsessler M; Weill Y; Zadok D; Abulafia A Am J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 233():38-47. PubMed ID: 34314687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry. Song MY; Noh SR; Kim KY PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251152. PubMed ID: 33945581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. COMPARISON OF OPTICAL BIOMETERS ARGOS AND IOL MASTER 700. Románek J; Sluková K Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2021; 77(6):295-299. PubMed ID: 35081719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Agreement between lens thickness measurements by ultrasound immersion biometry and optical biometry. Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Schiano-Lomoriello D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 30279088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry. Monera Lucas CE; Escolano Serrano J; Tarazona Jaimes C; Romero Valero D; Moya Martínez A; Martínez Toldos JJ Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2022 Dec; 97(12):670-675. PubMed ID: 36068133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Agreement between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers and a Partial Coherence Interferometer. Moon JY; Cho SC; Kim HJ; Jun RM; Han KE Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 35766049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Technical failure rates for biometry between swept-source and older-generation optical coherence methods: a review and meta-analysis. Kanclerz P; Hecht I; Tuuminen R BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):182. PubMed ID: 37101115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ocular biometry in dense cataracts: Comparison of partial-coherence interferometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography and immersion ultrasound. González-Godínez S; Saucedo-Urdapilleta R; Mayorquín-Ruiz M; Velasco-Barona C; Moragrega-Adame E; Domínguez-Varela IA; Gonzalez-Salinas R Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 70(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 34937218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes. Garcia Ardoy E; Mateos N; Roda L; Torrado Sierra O; Baptista AM; Serra PM Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Sep; 106(7):783-792. PubMed ID: 36508569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers. Tañá-Sanz P; Ruiz-Santos M; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Montés-Micó R; Tañá-Rivero P Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Apr; 18(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 33730515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]