BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

813 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33316277)

  • 1. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
    Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MCM; Cody JD; Mashayekhi A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD002912. PubMed ID: 28741303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 2():CD002912. PubMed ID: 26878400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-Year Results of Burch Compared With Midurethral Sling With Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Trabuco EC; Linder BJ; Klingele CJ; Blandon RE; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Gebhart JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29215517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.
    Abdel-Fattah M; Cooper D; Davidson T; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Bhal K; McDonald A; Wardle J; N'Dow J; MacLennan G; Norrie J
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Dec; 26(47):1-190. PubMed ID: 36520097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Burch Retropubic Urethropexy Compared With Midurethral Sling With Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Blandon RE; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Lemens MA; Gebhart JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 128(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 27607858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD002912. PubMed ID: 19821297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD002912. PubMed ID: 19370577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jun; (6):CD002912. PubMed ID: 22696331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
    Saraswat L; Rehman H; Omar MI; Cody JD; Aluko P; Glazener CM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jan; 1(1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 31990055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.
    Foss Hansen M; Lose G; Kesmodel US; Gradel KO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):263.e1-263.e8. PubMed ID: 26344752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
    Rehman H; Bezerra CA; Bruschini H; Cody JD; Aluko P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD001754. PubMed ID: 28743177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
    Rehman H; Bezerra CC; Bruschini H; Cody JD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jan; (1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 21249648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody DJ; Grant AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jul; (3):CD002912. PubMed ID: 16034879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of reoperation 10 years after surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a national population-based cohort study.
    Muller P; Gurol-Urganci I; van der Meulen J; Thakar R; Jha S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):645.e1-645.e14. PubMed ID: 34509439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody DJ; Grant AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD002912. PubMed ID: 12535443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reoperations for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Finnish National Register Study.
    Kurkijärvi K; Aaltonen R; Gissler M; Mäkinen J
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):754-759. PubMed ID: 28753896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
    van der Ploeg JM; van der Steen A; Oude Rengerink K; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP
    BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 24382099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.