These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33316431)

  • 21. Determining Significant Elevation of Intraocular Pressure Using Self-tonometry.
    Huang J; Phu J; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Feb; 97(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 32011580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
    Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology Tonometry on Intraocular Pressure.
    Borroni D; Gadhvi KA; Hristova R; McLean K; Rocha de Lossada C; Romano V; Kaye S
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Mar; 1(1):100003. PubMed ID: 36246003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of Axial Length on Intraocular Pressure Measurement With Three Tonometers in Childhood Glaucoma.
    Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Sanchez Jean R; Garcia-Feljoo J
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Jan; 57(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 31972037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
    Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term home monitoring of intraocular pressure in pediatric glaucoma.
    Bitner DP; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2016 Dec; 20(6):515-518. PubMed ID: 27702611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of cornea on intraocular pressure measurement by ICARE PRO and ORA.
    Pluháček F; Unzeitigová A; Marešová K; Rybář J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 75(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 31779459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Fluctuation of intraocular pressure in 24-hour telemonitoring compared to tonometry during normal office hours].
    Jürgens C; Antal S; Henrici K; Grossjohann R; Tost FH
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Jan; 226(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 19173164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Self-Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure Outside of Normal Office Hours Using Rebound Tonometry: Initial Clinical Experience in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma.
    Sood V; Ramanathan US
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):807-811. PubMed ID: 27513898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Miani F; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Brusini P
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Association between Rates of Visual Field Progression and Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Different Tonometers.
    Susanna BN; Ogata NG; Daga FB; Susanna CN; Diniz-Filho A; Medeiros FA
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Jan; 126(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 30114419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Real-world comparison between the Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry in a university glaucoma clinic.
    Blumberg MJ; Varikuti VNV; Weiner A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 41(5):1815-1825. PubMed ID: 33651312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.