291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33316444)
1. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty is superior to metal-on-conventional polyethylene at 20-year follow-up: A randomised clinical trial.
Vendittoli PA; Shahin M; Rivière C; Barry J; Lavoie P; Duval N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 107(1):102744. PubMed ID: 33316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Takegami Y; Komatsu D; Morita D; Ishiguro N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 104(8):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 30269967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.
Hallan G; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 32348085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.
Higuchi Y; Hasegawa Y; Seki T; Komatsu D; Ishiguro N
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1246-1250. PubMed ID: 26781388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Milošev I; Kovač S; Trebše R; Levašič V; Pišot V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Oct; 94(19):1756-63. PubMed ID: 23032586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cementless total hip arthroplasty survivorship between metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic on ceramic bearings: A case control study with a 5-9-year follow-up.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Hasegawa Y; Morita D; Komatsu D; Takegami Y; Ishiguro N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 104(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 29902637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High Risk of Neck-liner Impingement and Notching Observed with Thick Femoral Neck Implants in Ceramic-on-ceramic THA.
Kim HS; Park JW; Lee SJ; Lee YK; Ha YC; Koo KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Apr; 480(4):690-699. PubMed ID: 34699410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher risk of 2-year cup revision of ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing: analysis of 33,454 primary press-fit total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
van Loon J; Sierevelt IN; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Opdam KT; Poolman RW; Kerkhoffs GM; Haverkamp D
Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):280-287. PubMed ID: 34974763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.
Hannouche D; Devriese F; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Tourabaly I; Sedel L; Chevret S; Nizard R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 26341897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Squeaking Is Common and Increases Over Time Among Patients With Long-term Follow-up After Ceramic-on-ceramic THA.
Taniguchi K; Quacinella M; Barlow B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Apr; 479(4):736-744. PubMed ID: 33724977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings.
Varnum C; Pedersen AB; Kjærsgaard-Andersen P; Overgaard S
Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 25637339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?
Pitto RP; Garland M; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3790-5. PubMed ID: 26070775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Ideal Total Hip Replacement Bearing Surface in the Young Patient: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Alumina Ceramic-On-Ceramic With Ceramic-On-Conventional Polyethylene: 15-Year Follow-Up.
Atrey A; Wolfstadt JI; Hussain N; Khoshbin A; Ward S; Shahid M; Schemitsch EH; Waddell JP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1752-1756. PubMed ID: 29422350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?
Baek SH; Kim WK; Kim JY; Kim SY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3796-802. PubMed ID: 26126991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages and disadvantages of ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a review.
Gallo J; Goodman SB; Lostak J; Janout M
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2012 Sep; 156(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 23069885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Wear Rate between Ceramic-on-Ceramic, Metal on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene, and Metal-on-Metal Bearings.
Higuchi Y; Seki T; Morita D; Komatsu D; Takegami Y; Ishiguro N
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2019 May; 54(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 31363284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
