These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3331692)

  • 1. Performance of short-term tests for detection of human carcinogens.
    Kuroki T; Matsushima T
    Mutagenesis; 1987 Jan; 2(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 3331692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the rodent micronucleus assay in the screening of IARC carcinogens (groups 1, 2A and 2B) the summary report of the 6th collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS MMS. Collaborative Study of the Micronucleus Group Test. Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group.
    Morita T; Asano N; Awogi T; Sasaki YF; Sato S; Shimada H; Sutou S; Suzuki T; Wakata A; Sofuni T; Hayashi M
    Mutat Res; 1997 Feb; 389(1):3-122. PubMed ID: 9062586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transformation of BALB/c-3T3 cells: V. Transformation responses of 168 chemicals compared with mutagenicity in Salmonella and carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays.
    Matthews EJ; Spalding JW; Tennant RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Jul; 101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):347-482. PubMed ID: 8243403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between carcinogenicity and mutagenicity based on chemicals evaluated in the IARC monographs.
    Bartsch H; Tomatis L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Jan; 47():305-17. PubMed ID: 6337827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical exploration of four major genotoxicity data bases: an overview.
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1988; 12(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 3383841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combinations of genotoxic tests for the evaluation of group 1 IARC carcinogens.
    Bhagat J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):81-99. PubMed ID: 28695982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In silico assessment of chemical mutagenesis in comparison with results of Salmonella microsome assay on 909 chemicals.
    Hayashi M; Kamata E; Hirose A; Takahashi M; Morita T; Ema M
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 16257575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bacterial-mammalian mutagenesis correlations: mechanistic significance for carcinogenesis.
    Bartsch H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 407():351-61. PubMed ID: 6576679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between in vitro mutagenicity assays.
    Benigni R
    Mutagenesis; 1992 Sep; 7(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 1470028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals: discussion.
    McCann J; Ames BN
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1976 Mar; 73(3):950-4. PubMed ID: 768988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.
    Ashby J
    Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3325732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which rules for assembling short-term test batteries to predict carcinogenicity?
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(2-3):143-66. PubMed ID: 3449755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of mutagenic impurities in carcinogens and noncarcinogens by high-pressure liquid chromatography and the Salmonella/microsome test.
    Donahue EV; McCann J; Ames BN
    Cancer Res; 1978 Feb; 38(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 340030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of genetic toxicity patterns of carcinogens and noncarcinogens: strategies for predictive use of short-term assays.
    Tennant RW; Spalding JW; Stasiewicz S; Caspary WD; Mason JM; Resnick MA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1987 Nov; 75():87-95. PubMed ID: 3319571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC working paper 2/6. An appraisal of predictive tests for carcinogenicity.
    Purchase IF
    Mutat Res; 1982 Jul; 99(1):53-17. PubMed ID: 6811893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.