These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3331703)

  • 1. The interaction of statistical significance, biology of dose-response and test design in the assessment of genotoxicity data.
    Mitchell ID
    Mutagenesis; 1987 Mar; 2(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 3331703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage testing of safety: a statistical view.
    Hauschke D; Hothorn LA
    Altern Lab Anim; 2003 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():77-80. PubMed ID: 15595902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple comparisons to both a negative and a positive control.
    Hasler M
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 22232049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing.
    Rothfuss A; Honma M; Czich A; Aardema MJ; Burlinson B; Galloway S; Hamada S; Kirkland D; Heflich RH; Howe J; Nakajima M; O'Donovan M; Plappert-Helbig U; Priestley C; Recio L; Schuler M; Uno Y; Martus HJ
    Mutat Res; 2011 Aug; 723(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 21182982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An illusion of hormesis in the Ames test: statistical significance is not equivalent to biological significance.
    Zeiger E; Hoffmann GR
    Mutat Res; 2012 Jul; 746(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 22484510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biostatistical issues in the design and analysis of multiple or repeated genotoxicity assays.
    Edler L
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8187726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biostatistical assessment of mutagenicity studies by including the positive control.
    Hauschke D; Slacik-Erben R; Hensen S; Kaufmann R
    Biom J; 2005 Feb; 47(1):82-7; discussion 99-107. PubMed ID: 16395999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Report and summary of the major conclusions from statistics in genotoxicity testing working group from the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures (IWGTP), March 1999.
    Lovell DP; Yoshimura I; Hothorn LA; Margolin BH; Soper K
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2000; 35(3):260-3. PubMed ID: 10737960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues related to the experimental design and subsequent statistical analysis of in vivo and in vitro comet studies.
    Lovell DP; Thomas G; Dubow R
    Teratog Carcinog Mutagen; 1999; 19(2):109-19. PubMed ID: 10332808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of genotoxicity induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene or diethylnitrosamine in the Pig-a, micronucleus and Comet assays integrated into 28-day repeat dose studies.
    Shi J; Krsmanovic L; Bruce S; Kelly T; Paranjpe M; Szabo K; Arevalo M; Atta-Safoh S; Debelie F; LaForce MK; Sly J; Springer S
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Dec; 52(9):711-20. PubMed ID: 21976072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric analysis of rank transformed data for statistical assessment of genotoxicity data with examples from cultured mammalian cells.
    Mitchell IG; Amphlett NW; Rees RW
    Mutagenesis; 1994 Mar; 9(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 8201945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The resolving power of in vitro genotoxicity assays for cigarette smoke particulate matter.
    Scott K; Saul J; Crooks I; Camacho OM; Dillon D; Meredith C
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Jun; 27(4):1312-9. PubMed ID: 23499632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies in case of positive in vivo results in genotoxicity testing.
    Thybaud V; Macgregor JT; Müller L; Crebelli R; Dearfield K; Douglas G; Farmer PB; Gocke E; Hayashi M; Lovell DP; Lutz WK; Marzin D; Moore M; Nohmi T; Phillips DH; Van Benthem J
    Mutat Res; 2011 Aug; 723(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 20854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical analysis of BMD metrics in genetic toxicology part I: in vitro analyses to provide robust potency rankings and support MOA determinations.
    Wills JW; Johnson GE; Doak SH; Soeteman-Hernández LG; Slob W; White PA
    Mutagenesis; 2016 May; 31(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 26687511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Beta risk: an unrecognized risk of statistical error].
    Jenny JY
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 11319429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Experimental analysis and planning using the Salmonella/microsomes test].
    Bobrinev EV; Oblapenko NG; Podol'naia MA; Revazova IuA; Fonshteĭn LM
    Genetika; 1983 Nov; 19(11):1835-9. PubMed ID: 6360793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the sensitivity of the computational programs DEREK, TOPKAT, and MCASE in the prediction of the genotoxicity of pharmaceutical molecules.
    Snyder RD; Pearl GS; Mandakas G; Choy WN; Goodsaid F; Rosenblum IY
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 43(3):143-58. PubMed ID: 15065202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.