BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33317722)

  • 1. Supine anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus lateral position oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: A comparison of two approaches to the lumbosacral junction.
    Xi Z; Burch S; Mummaneni PV; Chang CC; Ruan H; Eichler C; Chou D
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 82(Pt A):134-140. PubMed ID: 33317722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postoperative spinal alignment comparison of lateral versus supine patient position L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Khajavi K; Menezes CM; Braly BA; Thomas JA
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2248-2254. PubMed ID: 35610486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic comparison of L5-S1 lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence and displacement by fixation strategy: anterior plate versus integrated screws.
    Theologis AA; Patel S; Burch S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Jan; 38(1):126-130. PubMed ID: 36057128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position.
    Singh S; McCloskey K; Ahmad HS; Turlip R; Ghenbot Y; Sinha S; Yoon JW
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e416-e426. PubMed ID: 35283360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion.
    Ashayeri K; Leon C; Tigchelaar S; Fatemi P; Follett M; Cheng I; Thomas JA; Medley M; Braly B; Kwon B; Eisen L; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):419-428. PubMed ID: 34600110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 using a novel implant with anterior plate fixation.
    Szadkowski M; d'Astorg H; Bouhali H; Aleksic I; Ramos-Pascual S; Fière V
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 32504869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors of instrumentation failure and pseudarthrosis after stand-alone L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective cohort study.
    Jaeger A; Giber D; Bastard C; Thiebaut B; Roubineau F; Flouzat Lachaniette CH; Dubory A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):338-346. PubMed ID: 31151106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior lumbar compared to oblique lumbar interbody approaches for multilevel fusions to the sacrum in adults with spinal deformity and degeneration.
    Xi Z; Chou D; Mummaneni PV; Ruan H; Eichler C; Chang CC; Burch S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Jun; 33(4):461-470. PubMed ID: 32534496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nguyen AQ; Ukogu C; Harvey JP; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Khanna K; Sheha ED; Gandhi SD; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 37148223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter assessment of outcomes and complications associated with transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion for fractional curve correction.
    Buell TJ; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Lafage V; Lafage R; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Kelly MP; Daniels AH; Gum JL; Soroceanu A; Hamilton DK; Gupta MC; Burton DC; Hostin RA; Kebaish KM; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Ames CP; Smith JS;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(6):729-742. PubMed ID: 34416723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic comparison of lordotic and hyperlordotic implants in L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Farber SH; Sagar S; Godzik J; Zhou JJ; Walker CT; Khajavi K; Turner JD; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 May; 36(5):775-783. PubMed ID: 34798612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The anterior-to-psoas approach for interbody fusion at the L5-S1 segment: clinical and radiological outcomes.
    Miscusi M; Trungu S; Ricciardi L; Forcato S; Ramieri A; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E14. PubMed ID: 32871565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of lordotic cages in L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) procedures.
    Bassani R; Gregori F; Morselli C; Querenghi A; Giacalone A; Agnoletto M; Mangiavini L; Peretti GM
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(4 Suppl. 3):23-28. Congress of the Italian Orthopaedic Research Society. PubMed ID: 33261253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
    Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study.
    Kadam A; Wigner N; Saville P; Arlet V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):650-660. PubMed ID: 28960160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-operative L5 radiculopathy after L5-S1 hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (HL-ALIF) is related to a greater increase of lordosis and smaller post-operative posterior disc height: results from a cohort study.
    Compagnone D; Langella F; Cecchinato R; Damilano M; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Lamartina C; Berjano P
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1640-1648. PubMed ID: 35597893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.