BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33319644)

  • 1. PseudoBase: a genomic visualization and exploration resource for the
    Korunes KL; Myers RB; Hardy R; Noor MAF
    Fly (Austin); 2021 Dec; 15(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 33319644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing.
    Kulathinal RJ; Stevison LS; Noor MA
    PLoS Genet; 2009 Jul; 5(7):e1000550. PubMed ID: 19578407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetics of hybrid male sterility among strains and species in the Drosophila pseudoobscura species group.
    McDermott SR; Noor MA
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):1969-78. PubMed ID: 21729052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in activities of amylase allozymes associated with chromosome inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura, D. persimilis and D. miranda.
    Norman RA; Prakash S
    Genetics; 1980 May; 95(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 6159250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives.
    Machado CA; Kliman RM; Markert JA; Hey J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):472-88. PubMed ID: 11919289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative genomics of accessory gland protein genes in Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura.
    Wagstaff BJ; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Apr; 22(4):818-32. PubMed ID: 15601888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular evolution of the Sex-Ratio inversion complex in Drosophila pseudoobscura: analysis of the Esterase-5 gene region.
    Babcock CS; Anderson WW
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Feb; 13(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 8587496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The speciation history of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives: inferences from DNA sequence variation at the period locus.
    Wang RL; Hey J
    Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1113-26. PubMed ID: 8913754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group.
    Machado CA; Hey J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jun; 270(1520):1193-202. PubMed ID: 12816659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rates and patterns of chromosomal evolution in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.
    Bartolomé C; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):779-91. PubMed ID: 16547107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inversions shape the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis on multiple timescales.
    Korunes KL; Machado CA; Noor MAF
    Evolution; 2021 Jul; 75(7):1820-1834. PubMed ID: 34041743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Machado CA; Haselkorn TS; Noor MA
    Genetics; 2007 Mar; 175(3):1289-306. PubMed ID: 17179068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. flyDIVaS: A Comparative Genomics Resource for Drosophila Divergence and Selection.
    Stanley CE; Kulathinal RJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2355-63. PubMed ID: 27226167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FlyBase: genomes by the dozen.
    Crosby MA; Goodman JL; Strelets VB; Zhang P; Gelbart WM;
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jan; 35(Database issue):D486-91. PubMed ID: 17099233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divergence between the Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis genome sequences in relation to chromosomal inversions.
    Noor MA; Garfield DA; Schaeffer SW; Machado CA
    Genetics; 2007 Nov; 177(3):1417-28. PubMed ID: 18039875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular population genetics of sequence length diversity in the Adh region of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Schaeffer SW
    Genet Res; 2002 Dec; 80(3):163-75. PubMed ID: 12688655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive selection on nucleotide substitutions and indels in accessory gland proteins of the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup.
    Schully SD; Hellberg ME
    J Mol Evol; 2006 Jun; 62(6):793-802. PubMed ID: 16752217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Genomic Analyses Provide New Insights into the Evolutionary Dynamics of Heterochromatin in Drosophila.
    Caizzi R; Moschetti R; Piacentini L; Fanti L; Marsano RM; Dimitri P
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Aug; 12(8):e1006212. PubMed ID: 27513559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Complex Landscape of Structural Divergence Between the Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis Genomes.
    Carpinteyro-Ponce J; Machado CA
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Mar; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 38482945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic impacts of chromosomal inversions in parapatric Drosophila species.
    McGaugh SE; Noor MA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 367(1587):422-9. PubMed ID: 22201171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.