132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33319856)
1. Investigating seafood substitution problems and consequences in Taiwan using molecular barcoding and deep microbiome profiling.
Chen PY; Ho CW; Chen AC; Huang CY; Liu TY; Liang KH
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21997. PubMed ID: 33319856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncovering the microbiome landscape in sashimi delicacies.
Ho CW; Chen PY; Liao YT; Cheng YF; Tsou HH; Liu TY; Liang KH
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5454. PubMed ID: 38443405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using DNA barcoding to track seafood mislabeling in Los Angeles restaurants.
Willette DA; Simmonds SE; Cheng SH; Esteves S; Kane TL; Nuetzel H; Pilaud N; Rachmawati R; Barber PH
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 28075039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A high proportion of red snapper sold in North Carolina is mislabeled.
Spencer ET; Richards E; Steinwand B; Clemons J; Dahringer J; Desai P; Fisher M; Fussell S; Gorman O; Jones D; Le A; Long K; McMahan C; Moscarito C; Pelay C; Price E; Smith A; VanSant A; Bruno JF
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9218. PubMed ID: 32617188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A glimpse into the genetic diversity of the Peruvian seafood sector: Unveiling species substitution, mislabeling and trade of threatened species.
Marín A; Serna J; Robles C; Ramírez B; Reyes-Flores LE; Zelada-Mázmela E; Sotil G; Alfaro R
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206596. PubMed ID: 30444869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection and identification of marine fish mislabeling in Guangzhou's supermarkets and sushi restaurants using DNA barcoding.
Liu B; Yang JW; Liu BS; Zhang N; Guo L; Guo HY; Zhang DC
J Food Sci; 2022 Jun; 87(6):2440-2449. PubMed ID: 35438192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FISH-BOL and seafood identification: geographically dispersed case studies reveal systemic market substitution across Canada.
Hanner R; Becker S; Ivanova NV; Steinke D
Mitochondrial DNA; 2011 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():106-22. PubMed ID: 21980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of DNA barcoding to reveal species composition of convenience seafood.
Huxley-Jones E; Shaw JL; Fletcher C; Parnell J; Watts PC
Conserv Biol; 2012 Apr; 26(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 22268756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA barcoding detected improper labelling and supersession of crab food served by restaurants in India.
Vartak VR; Narasimmalu R; Annam PK; Singh DP; Lakra WS
J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Jan; 95(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 24796530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA barcoding reveals global and local influences on patterns of mislabeling and substitution in the trade of fish in Mexico.
Munguia-Vega A; Terrazas-Tapia R; Dominguez-Contreras JF; Reyna-Fabian M; Zapata-Morales P
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265960. PubMed ID: 35421106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Raw ready-to-eat seafood safety: microbiological quality of the various seafood species available in fishery, hyper and online markets.
Kim HW; Hong YJ; Jo JI; Ha SD; Kim SH; Lee HJ; Rhee MS
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 64(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 27747902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seafood label quality and mislabelling rates hamper consumer choices for sustainability in Australia.
Cundy ME; Santana-Garcon J; McLennan AG; Ayad ME; Bayer PE; Cooper M; Corrigan S; Harrison E; Wilcox C
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):10146. PubMed ID: 37537170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA barcoding unveils a high rate of mislabeling in a commercial freshwater catfish from Brazil.
Carvalho DC; Neto DA; Brasil BS; Oliveira DA
Mitochondrial DNA; 2011 Oct; 22 Suppl 1():97-105. PubMed ID: 21707317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sushi barcoding in the UK: another kettle of fish.
Vandamme SG; Griffiths AM; Taylor SA; Di Muri C; Hankard EA; Towne JA; Watson M; Mariani S
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1891. PubMed ID: 27069819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survey of mislabelling across finfish supply chain reveals mislabelling both outside and within Canada.
Shehata HR; Bourque D; Steinke D; Chen S; Hanner R
Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():723-729. PubMed ID: 31108801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geographic Pattern of Sushi Product Misdescription in Italy-A Crosstalk between Citizen Science and DNA Barcoding.
Pappalardo AM; Raffa A; Calogero GS; Ferrito V
Foods; 2021 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33918119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA barcoding of fish species reveals low rate of package mislabeling in Qatar.
Chen KC; Zakaria D; Altarawneh H; Andrews GN; Ganesan GS; John KM; Khan S; Ladumor H
Genome; 2019 Feb; 62(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 30742542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A high-quality genetic reference database for European commercial fishes reveals substitution fraud of processed Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and common sole (Solea solea) at different steps in the Belgian supply chain.
Deconinck D; Volckaert FAM; Hostens K; Panicz R; Eljasik P; Faria M; Monteiro CS; Robbens J; Derycke S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2020 Jul; 141():111417. PubMed ID: 32437897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid Seafood Species Identification Using Chip-Based Capillary Electrophoresis and Protein Pattern Matching.
Walker CC; Lassitter CL; Lynn SN; Ford CB; Rademacher KR; Ruple AD; Bell JW
J AOAC Int; 2017 Sep; 100(5):1500-1510. PubMed ID: 28721842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA Barcoding analysis of seafood accuracy in Washington, D.C. restaurants.
Stern DB; Castro Nallar E; Rathod J; Crandall KA
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3234. PubMed ID: 28462038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
