BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33321264)

  • 1. Bone health assessment via digital wrist tomosynthesis in the mammography setting.
    Yeni YN; Oravec D; Drost J; Bevins N; Morrison C; Flynn MJ
    Bone; 2021 Mar; 144():115804. PubMed ID: 33321264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital wrist tomosynthesis (DWT)-based finite element analysis of ultra-distal radius differentiates patients with and without a history of osteoporotic fracture.
    Yadav RN; Oravec DJ; Morrison CK; Bevins NB; Rao SD; Yeni YN
    Bone; 2023 Dec; 177():116901. PubMed ID: 37714502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.
    Kälvesten J; Lui LY; Brismar T; Cummings S
    Bone; 2016 May; 86():30-5. PubMed ID: 26921822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.
    Kim YW; Kim JH; Yoon SH; Lee JH; Lee CH; Shin CS; Park YS
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):329-338. PubMed ID: 27480628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distal radial cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can predict osteoporosis: a cohort study.
    Ye C; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Wu Z; Chen K; Zhang X; Xiao L; Chen Z
    Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2617-2621. PubMed ID: 32807393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple Assessment of Global Bone Density and Osteoporosis Screening Using Standard Radiographs of the Hand.
    Schreiber JJ; Kamal RN; Yao J
    J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Apr; 42(4):244-249. PubMed ID: 28242242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Skaane P
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis.
    Mather J; MacDermid JC; Faber KJ; Athwal GS
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Jun; 22(6):732-8. PubMed ID: 23183030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Large cortical bone pores in the tibia are associated with proximal femur strength.
    Iori G; Schneider J; Reisinger A; Heyer F; Peralta L; Wyers C; Gräsel M; Barkmann R; Glüer CC; van den Bergh JP; Pahr D; Raum K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215405. PubMed ID: 30995279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of low bone mass and prediction of fracture risk using metacarpal radiogrammetry method: a comparative study with DXA and X-ray phantom.
    Ashok Kumar D; Anburajan M; Snekhalatha U
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 Jul; 21(7):1350-1371. PubMed ID: 29968333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    Shetty S; John B; Mohan S; Paul TV
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):25. PubMed ID: 32095943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Hounsfield Units to Assess Osteoporotic Status on Wrist Computed Tomography Scans: Comparison With Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
    Johnson CC; Gausden EB; Weiland AJ; Lane JM; Schreiber JJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jul; 41(7):767-74. PubMed ID: 27189150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.