104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33321264)
21. Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.
Marinova M; Edon B; Wolter K; Katsimbari B; Schild HH; Strunk HM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2015; 31(10):1871-81. PubMed ID: 26308674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast tomosynthesis: What do we know and where do we stand?
Mandoul C; Verheyden C; Millet I; Orliac C; Pages E; Thomassin I; Taourel P
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):537-551. PubMed ID: 31427217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preoperative measures of bone mineral density from digital wrist radiographs.
Robertson G; Wallace R; Simpson AHRW; Dawson SP
Bone Joint Res; 2021 Dec; 10(12):830-839. PubMed ID: 34927462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative estimation of percentage breast tissue density for digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Airaldi S; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Feb; 138(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 23338763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature.
Carbonaro LA; Di Leo G; Clauser P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Girometti R; Tafà A; Bruscoli P; Saguatti G; Bazzocchi M; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):808-14. PubMed ID: 26971428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Resource Utilization and Clinical Outcomes Following Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Findings From a Learning Health System.
Alsheik NH; Dabbous F; Pohlman SK; Troeger KM; Gliklich RE; Donadio GM; Su Z; Menon V; Conant EF
Acad Radiol; 2019 May; 26(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 30057195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation between distal radial cortical thickness and bone mineral density.
Webber T; Patel SP; Pensak M; Fajolu O; Rozental TD; Wolf JM
J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 40(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 25708436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. DXA evaluation of femoral bone mineral density and cortical width in patients with prior total knee arthroplasty.
Blaty T; Krueger D; Illgen R; Squire M; Heiderscheit B; Binkley N; Anderson P
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 30171301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Associations between radius low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity and bone fragility in elderly men and women.
Biver E; Pepe J; de Sire A; Chevalley T; Ferrari S
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Feb; 30(2):411-421. PubMed ID: 30306224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer].
Xu AQ; Weng XB; Zheng J; Li ZQ; Wang XL; Zhang SJ
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 41(5):667-672. PubMed ID: 31699198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe.
Alacreu E; Moratal D; Arana E
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Mar; 28(3):983-990. PubMed ID: 28108802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost differences between digital tomosynthesis and standard digital mammography in a breast cancer screening programme: results from the To-Be trial in Norway.
Moger TA; Swanson JO; Holen ÅS; Hanestad B; Hofvind S
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Nov; 20(8):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 31399773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
